Chandra and Dann: The City Club Match
Wendling writes it up at the PD. It sounds like Dann touts his legislative experience, while Subodh counters:
Chandra countered that, as a former federal white-collar prosecutor and Cleveland law director, he cleaned up fraud and corruption, went after predatory lenders and corporate polluters and operated “the people’s law firm” under former Mayor Jane Campbell.
Let’s remember what this race is about: Attorney General. Key word attorney. Not Legislative General. Key distinction.
It then got ugly and both guys went for the throat. Chandra claiming Dann couldn’t pass a background check, and Dann backpeddling then saying Subodh has plenty to run attack commercials on. What? Run commercials showing how Chandra helped expose and convict a money launderer in the IALIF case? Sure, go right ahead. That would blow up as Subodh comes out as the hero in this. Go right ahead.
And, again, it’s NOT a personal attack to scrutinize your legal practice if you are RUNNING FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL!!
