ProgressOhio’s take on the Dispatch’s take on the Noe tape

  • Posted by Brian
  • October 24, 2006

Confused yet?

Eric takes a swing at the Dispatch for failing to mention public officials by name who are currently running for office who are seen “chumming it up” with Noe in the now-infamous birthday roast tape. Specifically, the official running for Attorney General. You know, the state’s lawyer and top law enforcement official? The current state auditor?

(We’re talking about Betty Montgomery. We even gave you more clues than the Dispatch did.)

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.

Information
October 24th, 2006
No Responses
Feeds and Links
Comment Feed
From This Author
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Categories
AG 2006
Culture of Corruption
Elections

Other Posts
More baseless mudslinging by Pullins
Yes!

Say Something!

Because we value your thoughtful opinions, you are encouraged to add a comment to this post. Don't be offended if your comment is edited for clarity or to keep out questionable material. Comments may even be deleted at the discretion of the Plundercrew. You signal your agreement to this by clicking 'Submit Comment' below. Everyone who comments here is responsible for them.

Plunderchat:

Be the first to leave a comment!