<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA may drop lead air pollution limits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/</link>
	<description>All Politics.  All Ohio.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-14862</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/#comment-14862</guid>
		<description>People please think!  Nobody is going to put lead back into gasoline, nobody is saying it either (can&#039;t be done because new engines cannot accept it), there are many other lead applications that never were a factor to air pollution.  Folks, you enjoy your luxury products, because some potentially **hazardous** materials are used.  And guess what, people end up living longer because **hazardous** materials are used in careful applications.  Others want to classify CO2 as a pollutant, will you stop breathing then!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People please think!  Nobody is going to put lead back into gasoline, nobody is saying it either (can&#8217;t be done because new engines cannot accept it), there are many other lead applications that never were a factor to air pollution.  Folks, you enjoy your luxury products, because some potentially **hazardous** materials are used.  And guess what, people end up living longer because **hazardous** materials are used in careful applications.  Others want to classify CO2 as a pollutant, will you stop breathing then!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Esquire</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-13012</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/epa-may-drop-lead-air-pollution-limits/#comment-13012</guid>
		<description>And what with juvenile lung cancer deaths down, we can lift the ban of selling cigarettes to children, advertising them on cartoons (ala &quot;The Flinstones&quot;.)

And since child labor deaths have dropped 90%, we can drop child labor laws...

Is this some depth charge to see exactly how large the conservative base is really?  It just seems like this Administration is doing everything it can to see how low its approval ratings will go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what with juvenile lung cancer deaths down, we can lift the ban of selling cigarettes to children, advertising them on cartoons (ala &#8220;The Flinstones&#8221;.)</p>
<p>And since child labor deaths have dropped 90%, we can drop child labor laws&#8230;</p>
<p>Is this some depth charge to see exactly how large the conservative base is really?  It just seems like this Administration is doing everything it can to see how low its approval ratings will go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

