<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vessels &#8211; Naugle I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blumer</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13119</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13119</guid>
		<description>Temper, temper. :--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temper, temper. :&#8211;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13116</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13116</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an observation.  You set about little safety grenades that you can pop when you get called out.  Convenient yes, but still a bit pansy.  Just go ahead and say liberals are pansies already so we can box and get it over with.  Sheesh.  You conservatives are such weasels...I mean largely, if not predominantly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an observation.  You set about little safety grenades that you can pop when you get called out.  Convenient yes, but still a bit pansy.  Just go ahead and say liberals are pansies already so we can box and get it over with.  Sheesh.  You conservatives are such weasels&#8230;I mean largely, if not predominantly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blumer</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13110</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t understand the diff between &quot;largely&quot; (an observation), &quot;predominantly&quot; (an observation), and &quot;all&quot; (a stereotype), I can&#039;t help you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t understand the diff between &#8220;largely&#8221; (an observation), &#8220;predominantly&#8221; (an observation), and &#8220;all&#8221; (a stereotype), I can&#8217;t help you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13101</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13101</guid>
		<description>&quot;is largely, if not predominantly&quot;.  Dude, get a spine and own your rhetoric.  You are going to begin the narrative of pansy conservatives if you don&#039;t watch it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is largely, if not predominantly&#8221;.  Dude, get a spine and own your rhetoric.  You are going to begin the narrative of pansy conservatives if you don&#8217;t watch it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blumer</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13088</guid>
		<description>#5, A word search in my comment failed to find the word &quot;all.&quot;  You are &quot;summarizing&quot; something that doesn&#039;t exist, in an attempt to disprove a hypothesis that was never made. By doing so, you unfairly and incorrectly accused your correspondent of stereotyping. Nice try. No sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5, A word search in my comment failed to find the word &#8220;all.&#8221;  You are &#8220;summarizing&#8221; something that doesn&#8217;t exist, in an attempt to disprove a hypothesis that was never made. By doing so, you unfairly and incorrectly accused your correspondent of stereotyping. Nice try. No sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerid</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13034</guid>
		<description>Naugle doesn&#039;t deserve a long comment here. I&#039;ve found this whole thing pretty hysterical. His mouth wrote a check he couldn&#039;t cash. Politics aside, anybody knows that makes him a wimp. 

Feel free to keep telling us we&#039;re wrong on politics and policy, just don&#039;t think you can throw whatever personal remark you want our way. &#039;Cause remember, Vessels has got a standing offer on the table. 

The phrase goes &quot;put up or shut up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naugle doesn&#8217;t deserve a long comment here. I&#8217;ve found this whole thing pretty hysterical. His mouth wrote a check he couldn&#8217;t cash. Politics aside, anybody knows that makes him a wimp. </p>
<p>Feel free to keep telling us we&#8217;re wrong on politics and policy, just don&#8217;t think you can throw whatever personal remark you want our way. &#8216;Cause remember, Vessels has got a standing offer on the table. </p>
<p>The phrase goes &#8220;put up or shut up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13031</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13031</guid>
		<description>So to summarize:  You are basically saying &quot;yes, all liberals ARE pansies who speak in a sexless, souless, inflected voice&quot;.

I&#039;m just saying I think I disproved this hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to summarize:  You are basically saying &#8220;yes, all liberals ARE pansies who speak in a sexless, souless, inflected voice&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just saying I think I disproved this hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13030</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13030</guid>
		<description>So Tom.  Here&#039;s the thing.  You characterize my challenge as hyperventilating, yet you and your wingnut buddies spent the better part of a day going batshit crazy over something that didn&#039;t even exist.  Something someone with a voice that included duty and soul would have dismissed with a quickness.

Yet you and dozens, if not hundreds, of people were sitting around going &quot;Oh...My...God!&quot;.  No they didn&#039;t!  With a virtual rise in your voice at the end of every phrase.  I don&#039;t think there is much of a point to your boy Vanderleun&#039;s sexless voice thing.  But I feel like I know where the true neutered ones exist.  In the middle of their safe right-wing talking points, draped in their flag and religion.  Looking around for others who will nod their heads in labotomized agreement.  

The TKO was that Matt was silent in his reply to my quest to find the real pansy.  We all knew where he was the whole time anyway.  You included.  I think you and Vandy sell our youth short in a pretty big way with the characterization in his post.

I would surely exclude myself from whatever the hell it is he is talking about.  I think I have a pretty good sense of duty, honor, and country.  From the origin of the phrase, actually.  My duty is to call bullshit on right-wing crap, it is an honor to do so, and I do it for my country.  

Got me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Tom.  Here&#8217;s the thing.  You characterize my challenge as hyperventilating, yet you and your wingnut buddies spent the better part of a day going batshit crazy over something that didn&#8217;t even exist.  Something someone with a voice that included duty and soul would have dismissed with a quickness.</p>
<p>Yet you and dozens, if not hundreds, of people were sitting around going &#8220;Oh&#8230;My&#8230;God!&#8221;.  No they didn&#8217;t!  With a virtual rise in your voice at the end of every phrase.  I don&#8217;t think there is much of a point to your boy Vanderleun&#8217;s sexless voice thing.  But I feel like I know where the true neutered ones exist.  In the middle of their safe right-wing talking points, draped in their flag and religion.  Looking around for others who will nod their heads in labotomized agreement.  </p>
<p>The TKO was that Matt was silent in his reply to my quest to find the real pansy.  We all knew where he was the whole time anyway.  You included.  I think you and Vandy sell our youth short in a pretty big way with the characterization in his post.</p>
<p>I would surely exclude myself from whatever the hell it is he is talking about.  I think I have a pretty good sense of duty, honor, and country.  From the origin of the phrase, actually.  My duty is to call bullshit on right-wing crap, it is an honor to do so, and I do it for my country.  </p>
<p>Got me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13028</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13028</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fine.  I got more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fine.  I got more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/comment-page-1/#comment-13022</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/12/11/vessels-naugle-i/#comment-13022</guid>
		<description>Far from it, given that the people described here will be more often than not found to have liberal views, including the particular person being criticized:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/006007.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;

It&#039;s going to take more than a little boxing bravado and hyperventilation over one word by one blogger to counter Vanderleun&#039;s fundamentally accurate observations. If you wish to exclude yourself from the mentality of that group, be my guest. That doesn&#039;t change the fact that the group is still there, that it is largely, if not predominantly, liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far from it, given that the people described here will be more often than not found to have liberal views, including the particular person being criticized:</p>
<p><a href="http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/006007.php" rel="nofollow">HERE</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to take more than a little boxing bravado and hyperventilation over one word by one blogger to counter Vanderleun&#8217;s fundamentally accurate observations. If you wish to exclude yourself from the mentality of that group, be my guest. That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that the group is still there, that it is largely, if not predominantly, liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
