<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Say it With Me:  Pluripotency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/comment-page-1/#comment-38231</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/#comment-38231</guid>
		<description>Eh.  The profanity was a joke really.  Hence the setup:  &quot;I’ll do my best to respond in a very measured fashion.&quot;

Setup - Joke.  Plus I just really like profanity as a communication tool.  Plus I realy like the word fuck and all of it&#039;s offshoots.  Most versatile word in language.  

I like alliteration also, so thanks.  

I find it odd that you&#039;ll place a bet on this type of &quot;appear to&quot; potential, but won&#039;t give the same benefit to ESCR.  Telling.

Look, you can have your moral problems with this and for that attempt at every turn to block what you view as immoral.  I&#039;m anti-war.  I get that.  Just stop pretending your protestations are backed by science and not dogma because they aren&#039;t.

The bottom line here is we should support both kinds - and all kinds - of life saving research and not attempt to  legislate morality or scientific discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh.  The profanity was a joke really.  Hence the setup:  &#8220;I’ll do my best to respond in a very measured fashion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Setup &#8211; Joke.  Plus I just really like profanity as a communication tool.  Plus I realy like the word fuck and all of it&#8217;s offshoots.  Most versatile word in language.  </p>
<p>I like alliteration also, so thanks.  </p>
<p>I find it odd that you&#8217;ll place a bet on this type of &#8220;appear to&#8221; potential, but won&#8217;t give the same benefit to ESCR.  Telling.</p>
<p>Look, you can have your moral problems with this and for that attempt at every turn to block what you view as immoral.  I&#8217;m anti-war.  I get that.  Just stop pretending your protestations are backed by science and not dogma because they aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The bottom line here is we should support both kinds &#8211; and all kinds &#8211; of life saving research and not attempt to  legislate morality or scientific discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blumer</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/comment-page-1/#comment-38228</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/13/say-it-with-me-pluripotency/#comment-38228</guid>
		<description>Non-embryonics appear to positively possess plenty of pluripotent potential. See the update. Why must you go profane at the drop of a stem cell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-embryonics appear to positively possess plenty of pluripotent potential. See the update. Why must you go profane at the drop of a stem cell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
