<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raise Your Hand If You Watched The Debate&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-42339</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-42339</guid>
		<description>#3:  no worries.  i don't particularly like the way he presents it, but can't say i've ever really disagreed with much he's said.  presentation?  yes.  read an article in a buddhist journal about 3 years ago with him and since then I've been endeared to him somewhat.  He had alot of good things to say in it.

I fully get the point of abandoning his district, etc.  I do get tired of the non-stop bashing and "kook" stuff.  My take is with the status quo we'd all do good to get a little "crazy"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3:  no worries.  i don&#8217;t particularly like the way he presents it, but can&#8217;t say i&#8217;ve ever really disagreed with much he&#8217;s said.  presentation?  yes.  read an article in a buddhist journal about 3 years ago with him and since then I&#8217;ve been endeared to him somewhat.  He had alot of good things to say in it.</p>
<p>I fully get the point of abandoning his district, etc.  I do get tired of the non-stop bashing and &#8220;kook&#8221; stuff.  My take is with the status quo we&#8217;d all do good to get a little &#8220;crazy&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-42033</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-42033</guid>
		<description>very nice write-up, eric.  obviously, i disagree w/ the kookoonich grade.  just can't get on board w/ the new-age/stardust stuff.  yeah, it's my personal bias...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice write-up, eric.  obviously, i disagree w/ the kookoonich grade.  just can&#8217;t get on board w/ the new-age/stardust stuff.  yeah, it&#8217;s my personal bias&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-41948</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-41948</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by.  I might agree that Edwards was a bit non-Presidential.  he wasn't on top of his game, but then again the questions his way were horrid.  Don't see the Obama point or that Clinton was overly "Presidential".  

Besides, I don't necessarily think this is the time for Presidential-ness.  You are appealing at this point to the base of the party you are trying to get a nomination from.  You can't do anything dumb that will be lasting, but you also shouldn't worry much about "appearing Presidential".  That will come later once you are actually running.  

Articulate and insane.  I like that.  When the going gets weird...

You forgot Dodd's name.  Perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by.  I might agree that Edwards was a bit non-Presidential.  he wasn&#8217;t on top of his game, but then again the questions his way were horrid.  Don&#8217;t see the Obama point or that Clinton was overly &#8220;Presidential&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Besides, I don&#8217;t necessarily think this is the time for Presidential-ness.  You are appealing at this point to the base of the party you are trying to get a nomination from.  You can&#8217;t do anything dumb that will be lasting, but you also shouldn&#8217;t worry much about &#8220;appearing Presidential&#8221;.  That will come later once you are actually running.  </p>
<p>Articulate and insane.  I like that.  When the going gets weird&#8230;</p>
<p>You forgot Dodd&#8217;s name.  Perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-41942</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/04/27/raise-your-hand-if-you-watched-the-debate/#comment-41942</guid>
		<description>Good summary. My take:
Clinton was presidential. Obama and Edwards were not. Biden was funny and sharp. Gravel was entertaining. Kucinich was articulate and insane. Richardson hurt himself, but it was just a flesh wound. I forgot the other guys name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary. My take:<br />
Clinton was presidential. Obama and Edwards were not. Biden was funny and sharp. Gravel was entertaining. Kucinich was articulate and insane. Richardson hurt himself, but it was just a flesh wound. I forgot the other guys name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
