Felonious behavior at 1600 Pennsylvania?


It appears a real, actual, indictable felony may have occured when Bush ordered Harriet Miers to defy a congressional subpoena. Via TPM:

Invoking a privilege is one thing, but telling a person not to show up in response to a subpoena — if only to actually invoke the privilege — is quite another. It’s not just worse, it’s a felony under federal criminal law. See for yourself.

18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 : … Whoever corruptly … influences, obstructs, or impedes … the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress … [s]hall be fined under this title, [or] imprisoned not more than 5 years … or both.

18 U.S.C. Sec. 1515(b) : As used in section 1505, the term “corruptly” means acting with an improper purpose, personally or by influencing another, including … withholding, [or] concealing … information.

In other words, George Bush could be imprisoned for up to five years for “corruptly impeding” a Congressional investigation by influencing another person to withhold or conceal information. Harriet Miers could have shown up and claimed Executive privilege, but George Bush does NOT have the authority to tell anyone to ignore a subpoena.

Yet another piece of evidence that this White House believes they are above the law.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
I love Boehner
Republican Gay Issues Forum?


Say Something!

Because we value your thoughtful opinions, you are encouraged to add a comment to this post. Don't be offended if your comment is edited for clarity or to keep out questionable material. Comments may even be deleted at the discretion of the Plundercrew. You signal your agreement to this by clicking 'Submit Comment' below. Everyone who comments here is responsible for them.

Plunderchat:

Be the first to leave a comment!