Another Anti-Choice Bill Introduced in Ohio


State Rep. Shannon Jones (R) introduced HB 314 yesterday- another crap, anti-choice bill aimed at whittling away at women’s reproductive rights in Ohio by extending our state’s already-restrictive laws on abortion.

The sad part is, two Democrats co-sponsored the thing: Matthew H. Barrett (D-Amherst) and L. George Distel (D-Conneaut).

Come on boys, get with the program!

Here’s what the bill wants to add:

Sec. 2317.561. In addition to the requirements in section 2317.56 of the Revised Code, if an obstetric ultrasound examination is performed at any time prior to the performance or inducement of an abortion or the physician performing or inducing the abortion determines that an ultrasound examination will be performed as part of the abortion procedure, the physician shall do both of the following prior to the performance or inducement of the abortion:
(A) Provide the pregnant woman receiving the abortion the opportunity to view the active ultrasound image of the embryo or fetus;
(B) Offer to provide the pregnant woman with a physical picture of the ultrasound image of the embryo or fetus.
The requirements of division (A) of this section shall be performed at no additional charge to the pregnant woman.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Value Voters
Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger


Say Something!

Because we value your thoughtful opinions, you are encouraged to add a comment to this post. Don't be offended if your comment is edited for clarity or to keep out questionable material. Comments may even be deleted at the discretion of the Plundercrew. You signal your agreement to this by clicking 'Submit Comment' below. Everyone who comments here is responsible for them.

Plunderchat:

“Would you like a souvenir photo from your abortion, miss? It’s only $20, and comes with this decorative ‘I aborted this fetus’ frame!”

That’s what I was thinking too.

Still- I find it hard to believe that an ultrasound picture could really change anyone’s mind:

#1: They better NOT be charging $20:

The requirements of division (A) of this section shall be performed at no additional charge to the pregnant woman.

I missed two democrat cosponsors (there are 4 total): Dodd and Garrison.

[…] folks, we have a new contender for a piece of Ohio legislation that might need a 57 reasons post. From Plunderbund: State Rep. Shannon Jones (R) introduced HB 314 yesterday- another crap, anti-choice bill aimed at […]

Joseph, I tend to agree with what you stated, if a picture of a fetus at that stage of development would make a woman change her mind about having an abortion then perhaps she was really questioning having one in the first place.

I understand completely the reasoning behind not supporting this because it appears to place yet another requirement that a woman could have to go through to be able to have an abortion and while this bill may only “suggest” rather than require an ultrasound must be done, it’s very well possible if this passes the next step could be requiring an ultrasound for all abortions.

[…] really not surprised that the ridiculous ultrasound/abortion bill actually passed in the Republican-controlled House […]