<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Anti-Choice Bill Introduced in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Plunderbund - &#187; Another Anti-Choice Bill Passes House</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-89468</link>
		<dc:creator>Plunderbund - &#187; Another Anti-Choice Bill Passes House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-89468</guid>
		<description>[...] really not surprised that the ridiculous ultrasound/abortion bill actually passed in the Republican-controlled House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] really not surprised that the ridiculous ultrasound/abortion bill actually passed in the Republican-controlled House [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-72036</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-72036</guid>
		<description>Joseph, I tend to agree with what you stated, if a picture of a fetus at that stage of development would make a woman change her mind about having an abortion then perhaps she was really questioning having one in the first place.  

I understand completely the reasoning behind not supporting this because it appears to place yet another requirement that a woman could have to go through to be able to have an abortion and while this bill may only "suggest" rather than require an ultrasound must be done, it's very well possible if this passes the next step could be requiring an ultrasound for all abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, I tend to agree with what you stated, if a picture of a fetus at that stage of development would make a woman change her mind about having an abortion then perhaps she was really questioning having one in the first place.  </p>
<p>I understand completely the reasoning behind not supporting this because it appears to place yet another requirement that a woman could have to go through to be able to have an abortion and while this bill may only &#8220;suggest&#8221; rather than require an ultrasound must be done, it&#8217;s very well possible if this passes the next step could be requiring an ultrasound for all abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohio legislators want to force doctors to show patients pre-abortion ultrasounds at time of procedure &#124; Writes Like She Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohio legislators want to force doctors to show patients pre-abortion ultrasounds at time of procedure &#124; Writes Like She Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71863</guid>
		<description>[...] folks, we have a new contender for a piece of Ohio legislation that might need a 57 reasons post. From Plunderbund: State Rep. Shannon Jones (R) introduced HB 314 yesterday- another crap, anti-choice bill aimed at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] folks, we have a new contender for a piece of Ohio legislation that might need a 57 reasons post. From Plunderbund: State Rep. Shannon Jones (R) introduced HB 314 yesterday- another crap, anti-choice bill aimed at [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71843</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71843</guid>
		<description>I missed two democrat cosponsors (there are 4 total): Dodd and Garrison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed two democrat cosponsors (there are 4 total): Dodd and Garrison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71839</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71839</guid>
		<description>#1:  They better NOT be charging $20:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The requirements of division (A) of this section shall be performed at no additional charge to the pregnant woman.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1:  They better NOT be charging $20:</p>
<blockquote><p>The requirements of division (A) of this section shall be performed at no additional charge to the pregnant woman.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71836</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71836</guid>
		<description>That's what I was thinking too.

Still- I find it hard to believe that an ultrasound picture could really change anyone's mind:

&lt;img src="http://pregnancy.about.com/library/ultrasounds/02us06a.jpg" width=200/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I was thinking too.</p>
<p>Still- I find it hard to believe that an ultrasound picture could really change anyone&#8217;s mind:</p>
<p><img src="http://pregnancy.about.com/library/ultrasounds/02us06a.jpg" width=200/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71832</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/09/19/another-anti-choice-bill-introduced-in-ohio/#comment-71832</guid>
		<description>"Would you like a souvenir photo from your abortion, miss?  It's only $20, and comes with this decorative 'I aborted this fetus' frame!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Would you like a souvenir photo from your abortion, miss?  It&#8217;s only $20, and comes with this decorative &#8216;I aborted this fetus&#8217; frame!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
