It’s Official: George Bush Hates Kids


The latest news from CNN :

Bush quietly exercised the veto at 10 a.m. before leaving the White House for a trip to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, to discuss the federal budget and taxes.

Bush said he opposed the bill because it is a step toward “universal coverage, which he opposes on philosophical grounds”. Which is the argument wing nuts alway use when then want to deny basic healthcare coverage to people who can’t afford it.

Does anyone really believe that rich, or even middle class people are going to lose their private health insurance just because the government pays for some poor children to see the doctor?

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
New Smuggled Video out of Burma and “Free Burma” International Blogger Day
FOX News beats the drums of war… sound familiar?


Say Something!

Because we value your thoughtful opinions, you are encouraged to add a comment to this post. Don't be offended if your comment is edited for clarity or to keep out questionable material. Comments may even be deleted at the discretion of the Plundercrew. You signal your agreement to this by clicking 'Submit Comment' below. Everyone who comments here is responsible for them.

Plunderchat:

From Wikipedia :

“It also would have increased the eligibility from couples earning up to 200% of the federal poverty level to couples earning 300% of the federal poverty level, approximately $62,000 for a family of four.”

Unless I am missing something, when is making $62,000 a year considered poor for a family of 4? Thats well above the median household income in the United States. Besides, $62k a year is an arbitrary number. You might be living in poverty on that salary while in California, but I’d bet that same household income is quite comfortable in, say, Wyoming.

Think about it this way:

62 / 4 = 15.5

Would you consider $15.5K poor?

I see what you are trying to say. However, using that logic, then, a family making $100k a year with 4 kids is poor?

100/6 = 16.6.

or what about a family making $77.5k a year with 3 kids?

77.5/5 = 15.5k.

The 2007 HHS Poverty Guidelines add $3,480 for each additional person in the 48 Contiguous States and D.C.

Alaska and Hawaii have different number.

[…] how I should spend my money (I.E., my financial freedom).  The biggest example of this was his post on SCHIP.  Apparently, Bush hates kids because he vetoed this bill… at this point I’m […]

[…] bill was unambiguously designed to be vetoed so that Democrats could call Bush a “baby-hater“. The Democrats never thought this bill would pass. Despite the Democrats exploitation of 12 […]