Comments on: Wingnuts at it again http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/ A Progressive Political Playground Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:17:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: DavidC http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-78118 DavidC Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:44:44 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-78118 The <i>ad hominem</i> blog posting is singularly unimpressive. The ad hominem blog posting is singularly unimpressive.

]]> By: Brian http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-76027 Brian Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:08:38 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-76027 #7 - I'm actually an Iranian spy. Poole blew my deep cover. #5 - I said "appears to be". As Mr. Poole so kindly points out, I have a job that I have to do, meaning I have limited time to do original research. Bannockburn was <em>exceptionally</em> difficult to find <em>any</em> information on. You say you are not a Christian Reconstructionist, and I have little choice but to take your word for it despite the kinds of people you seem to have a record of association with (see? I'm much more charitable than Mr. Poole). I thought these tidbits about Mr. Poole might provide one explanation at why he's so eager to attack any public Muslim in sight. I tried to be careful to limit this post to shining a light on things, and not drawing reckless conclusions. #7 - I’m actually an Iranian spy. Poole blew my deep cover.

#5 - I said “appears to be”. As Mr. Poole so kindly points out, I have a job that I have to do, meaning I have limited time to do original research. Bannockburn was exceptionally difficult to find any information on. You say you are not a Christian Reconstructionist, and I have little choice but to take your word for it despite the kinds of people you seem to have a record of association with (see? I’m much more charitable than Mr. Poole). I thought these tidbits about Mr. Poole might provide one explanation at why he’s so eager to attack any public Muslim in sight. I tried to be careful to limit this post to shining a light on things, and not drawing reckless conclusions.

]]> By: likwidshoe http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75942 likwidshoe Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:21:11 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75942 Oh, man. You cite the SPLC while calling someone <i>else</i> a hack!? That's rich. Thanks for the belly laugh. Oh, man. You cite the SPLC while calling someone else a hack!? That’s rich. Thanks for the belly laugh.

]]> By: Je support les troops http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75864 Je support les troops Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:22:34 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75864 I want to see *MY* CAIR dossier! I want to see *MY* CAIR dossier!

]]> By: Eric http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75850 Eric Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:05:45 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75850 #6: I found that kinda funny too. I did not know Brian had access to secret dossiers. Fascinating though! Je is referring to this post: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/radical_islams_willing_blogger.html #6: I found that kinda funny too. I did not know Brian had access to secret dossiers. Fascinating though!

Je is referring to this post:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/radical_islams_willing_blogger.html

]]> By: Je support les troops http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75849 Je support les troops Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:01:53 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75849 Poole thinks you have access to a SECRET DOSSIER that CAIR has assembled about him. What sort of complex must one have in order to believe that THE MUSLIM SCOURGE considers them to be such a threat that they keep a file on them? Poole thinks you have access to a SECRET DOSSIER that CAIR has assembled about him.

What sort of complex must one have in order to believe that THE MUSLIM SCOURGE considers them to be such a threat that they keep a file on them?

]]> By: George Grant http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75835 George Grant Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:30:44 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75835 You probably ought to do your homework before pontificating--and best to try to use something other than the tired rumor-mills and glittering generalities on the web. Facts: 1. I am not a "Christian Reconstructionist." 2. Bannockburn is not an "unaccredited religious college." 3. Neither is it "the college of King's Meadow." 4. What "close ties with Dr. D. James Kennedy" even means, much less what it has to do with this discussion ought to be altogether baffling to anyone interested in an honest dialog. Guilt by very, very, very long distance association is hardly an argument for anything. 5. If you want to know what my "views" on any particular subject might be, you might try reading my books rather than relying on snippets of video clips on YouTube. You probably ought to do your homework before pontificating–and best to try to use something other than the tired rumor-mills and glittering generalities on the web. Facts:
1. I am not a “Christian Reconstructionist.”
2. Bannockburn is not an “unaccredited religious college.”
3. Neither is it “the college of King’s Meadow.”
4. What “close ties with Dr. D. James Kennedy” even means, much less what it has to do with this discussion ought to be altogether baffling to anyone interested in an honest dialog. Guilt by very, very, very long distance association is hardly an argument for anything.
5. If you want to know what my “views” on any particular subject might be, you might try reading my books rather than relying on snippets of video clips on YouTube.

]]> By: Neo-con blogger masquerading as "leftist" | Writes Like She Talks http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75809 Neo-con blogger masquerading as "leftist" | Writes Like She Talks Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:48:55 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75809 [...] So thank you, Patrick Poole who really should be thanking Plunderbund. [...] […] So thank you, Patrick Poole who really should be thanking Plunderbund. […]

]]> By: Jill http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75417 Jill Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:24:42 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75417 Brian, I agree with you and w/Dave. I agree with you that Poole's reporting leaves a lot to be desired. It doesn't ever sound like he's spoken to anyone - but maybe I'm just reading all the wrong stuff he's written. But I agree with Dave, there's no need to attack Poole when the substance of his reporting is also problematic: it's baiting and particularly he uses Jews and Judaism and Israel in a way that many Jews never would. That's perhaps what bothers me the most. I've written it before but there are definitely some people who I wish would love us chosen folks just a little bit less sometimes and find some other good reasons to be concerned about people's behavior. Brian, I agree with you and w/Dave. I agree with you that Poole’s reporting leaves a lot to be desired. It doesn’t ever sound like he’s spoken to anyone - but maybe I’m just reading all the wrong stuff he’s written. But I agree with Dave, there’s no need to attack Poole when the substance of his reporting is also problematic: it’s baiting and particularly he uses Jews and Judaism and Israel in a way that many Jews never would. That’s perhaps what bothers me the most. I’ve written it before but there are definitely some people who I wish would love us chosen folks just a little bit less sometimes and find some other good reasons to be concerned about people’s behavior.

]]> By: Dave http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75267 Dave Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:08:46 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/10/08/wingnuts-at-it-again/#comment-75267 Congratulations: a perfectly constructed ad-hominem attack that did nothing to deal with the substance of his reporting. Congratulations: a perfectly constructed ad-hominem attack that did nothing to deal with the substance of his reporting.

]]>