<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Somebody find Tom Blumer a hobby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/comment-page-1/#comment-89022</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/#comment-89022</guid>
		<description>I have really not much clue wtf you are talking about, but it sounds like Tom just got Blumered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have really not much clue wtf you are talking about, but it sounds like Tom just got Blumered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/comment-page-1/#comment-89020</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/2007/12/11/somebody-find-tom-blumer-a-hobby/#comment-89020</guid>
		<description>Out of curiousity, I plugged those numbers into my statistical software, and found a few interesting things.  First - and this isn&#039;t exactly a relevation, since it&#039;s plainly obvious - the use of the word &quot;holiday&quot; widely outstrips the use of &quot;christmas&quot; in both &quot;positive&quot; and negative contexts.  (I&#039;m assuming Tom is claiming that rampant consumerism is positive.)  Second, the use of &quot;holiday layoffs&quot; has been trending rather consistently upwards in frequency.  Conversely, &quot;christmas shopping&quot; and &quot;holiday shopping&quot; both showed a minor uptick in 2006, followed by a huge jump in 2007.  &quot;christmas layoffs&quot; actually &lt;em&gt;dropped&lt;/em&gt; in 2006.

However, what&#039;s most interesting are the pairwise correlations of the trends over time.  All, of course, were positively correlated, but only one was significant: the more frequently someone uses &quot;christmas shopping season&quot;, the more frequently you&#039;ll see &quot;christmas layoffs&quot;.  If you expand your confidence interval out to 90%, you see a significant correlation between &quot;christmas shopping season&quot; and &quot;holiday shopping season&quot;.  That&#039;s it.

Anything else is pure speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiousity, I plugged those numbers into my statistical software, and found a few interesting things.  First &#8211; and this isn&#8217;t exactly a relevation, since it&#8217;s plainly obvious &#8211; the use of the word &#8220;holiday&#8221; widely outstrips the use of &#8220;christmas&#8221; in both &#8220;positive&#8221; and negative contexts.  (I&#8217;m assuming Tom is claiming that rampant consumerism is positive.)  Second, the use of &#8220;holiday layoffs&#8221; has been trending rather consistently upwards in frequency.  Conversely, &#8220;christmas shopping&#8221; and &#8220;holiday shopping&#8221; both showed a minor uptick in 2006, followed by a huge jump in 2007.  &#8220;christmas layoffs&#8221; actually <em>dropped</em> in 2006.</p>
<p>However, what&#8217;s most interesting are the pairwise correlations of the trends over time.  All, of course, were positively correlated, but only one was significant: the more frequently someone uses &#8220;christmas shopping season&#8221;, the more frequently you&#8217;ll see &#8220;christmas layoffs&#8221;.  If you expand your confidence interval out to 90%, you see a significant correlation between &#8220;christmas shopping season&#8221; and &#8220;holiday shopping season&#8221;.  That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Anything else is pure speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
