Watching the basketball game, but I was looking at CNN’s exit polling and something interesting jumped out at me…
Despite Clinton supporters claiming that Obama and his supporters are sexist, of people who answered the question “was the gender of the candidate important to you?” in the affirmative went for Clinton 57% to 43%. Voters who answered “no” split nearly down the middle. Additionally, of voters who said that the race of the candidate was important, Clinton was winning 56-43. Of voters who said race wasn’t important, voters split down the middle.
Very interesting.
Get Email Updates
PB Twitter Feed
- Getting @disqus system errors on the site if you are trying to comment. We have a note in to support.
- RT @joshualyman: Imagine Reince Prebius's morning. The schaudenfreude will fuel you for hours. #p2
- "Presumptive nominee" Mitt Romney has actually lost more primary/caucus contests than he won.
- New License Plate Slogan: Ohio, our cows DO NOT have blue tongues. http://t.co/onFFmILc
- Transcript of Kasich's 2012 SOTS speech - now with a word cloud! http://t.co/IMBvnU2g
- @bytor3bp @MattNaugle You guys are going to love my next post. (Joe)
- @SLCarbo @JohnKasich Yeah, the twitterverse is filled with praise of Kasich. Thought you were taking time off to campaign against DeWine?
- Well, there's one thing that nobody is talking about being possible after today's #SOTS: A bounce in the polls.
- @joevardon @jimheathonn @joingles So have any of you noticed when @JohnKasich stopped calling it the #JobsBudget? Didn't use the term once.
- Get the feeling after today's #SOTS that @JohnKasich's team had no plans for the rest of their term past the first year?
Advertisement
Advertisement






Pingback: Plunderbund - » Was racism a factor?