<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Marc Dann &#8216;What If&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/</link>
	<description>All Politics.  All Ohio.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jack Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/comment-page-1/#comment-100025</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jack Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=3763#comment-100025</guid>
		<description>I think Republicans would be wise to act quickly on impeachment.  The Democrats might get burned if they drag this out, but I don&#039;t see Republicans trying to drag this out.  Republican foot-dragging in an attempt to tag the Dann problem on to other Democrats is not a winning strategy.  There is an incentive to remedy the situation quickly:  a special election to fill the remainder of the term. Dann is the one who gains by staying in office, which partly explains why he&#039;s still there.  If Democrat leaders want to tactically delay having the AG&#039;s office vacant in order to appoint someone without holding an AG election until 2010, then they might want to drag their feet on impeachment, but, like I said, they&#039;d probably get burned.  So if the Democrat leaders are not averse to holding a special election, then I think the General Assembly will want to proceed with haste, and Marc Dann will be the only one trying to bog down the process.  Dann&#039;s gonna do a number on Ohio just like Kwame Kilpatrick is doing to the city of Detroit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Republicans would be wise to act quickly on impeachment.  The Democrats might get burned if they drag this out, but I don&#8217;t see Republicans trying to drag this out.  Republican foot-dragging in an attempt to tag the Dann problem on to other Democrats is not a winning strategy.  There is an incentive to remedy the situation quickly:  a special election to fill the remainder of the term. Dann is the one who gains by staying in office, which partly explains why he&#8217;s still there.  If Democrat leaders want to tactically delay having the AG&#8217;s office vacant in order to appoint someone without holding an AG election until 2010, then they might want to drag their feet on impeachment, but, like I said, they&#8217;d probably get burned.  So if the Democrat leaders are not averse to holding a special election, then I think the General Assembly will want to proceed with haste, and Marc Dann will be the only one trying to bog down the process.  Dann&#8217;s gonna do a number on Ohio just like Kwame Kilpatrick is doing to the city of Detroit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State News Shot &#187; OH AG: Who&#8217;s Blogging on Marc Dann</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/comment-page-1/#comment-100024</link>
		<dc:creator>State News Shot &#187; OH AG: Who&#8217;s Blogging on Marc Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=3763#comment-100024</guid>
		<description>[...] Plunderbund  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plunderbund  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/comment-page-1/#comment-100021</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=3763#comment-100021</guid>
		<description>But you are right- it does seem unlikely they would reject the impeachment stuff though.

Instead they&#039;ll just drag it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you are right- it does seem unlikely they would reject the impeachment stuff though.</p>
<p>Instead they&#8217;ll just drag it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/comment-page-1/#comment-100020</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=3763#comment-100020</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/04/30/house-republicans-amend-anti-keno-bill-to-pay-day-lending-legislation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;attaching&lt;/a&gt; that anti-keno crap to the pay day lending bill just so they could get the Dems on record voting for Keno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Like <a href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/04/30/house-republicans-amend-anti-keno-bill-to-pay-day-lending-legislation/" rel="nofollow">attaching</a> that anti-keno crap to the pay day lending bill just so they could get the Dems on record voting for Keno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/05/another-marc-dann-what-if/comment-page-1/#comment-100018</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=3763#comment-100018</guid>
		<description>Good question.  I don&#039;t put it past them, but I doubt they would.  Even their constituents would wonder WTF.  It would be too clear what they were pulling and they&#039;d probably pay a bit for it.  

But I&#039;m not saying they won&#039;t.  They&#039;ve pulled lots of legislative hijinks in the past!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.  I don&#8217;t put it past them, but I doubt they would.  Even their constituents would wonder WTF.  It would be too clear what they were pulling and they&#8217;d probably pay a bit for it.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not saying they won&#8217;t.  They&#8217;ve pulled lots of legislative hijinks in the past!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

