Where they got their votes


We’ve seen these kinds of charts before, but this one is especially good; it shows where Clinton and Obama got their support, when, and explains the why (as much as they can, anyway). Very interesting.

Click on the image to view full-size.

What’s interesting is how strongly Obama performed in urban areas, with three or four notable exceptions: largely Hispanic areas in the Southwest (like LA), South Florida, Appalachia, and Boston (?). Clinton’s showing in New York is not at all surprising, of course, and I expect that Obama will do just fine there in the general.

I think this map may play into the VP selection process. I hope to have some thoughts on that issue in the near future.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
“Show me your papers!”
The First Lady Sings on Friday


Say Something!

Because we value your thoughtful opinions, you are encouraged to add a comment to this post. Don't be offended if your comment is edited for clarity or to keep out questionable material. Comments may even be deleted at the discretion of the Plundercrew. You signal your agreement to this by clicking 'Submit Comment' below. Everyone who comments here is responsible for them.

Plunderchat:

Is it really that interesting he performed well in urban areas?

What I find interesting about that is the fact that Clinton - the “party insider” at the start of the contest - did poorly in the areas that are traditional Democratic strongholds, and well in areas that are normally carried by Republicans. And - outside the areas I mentioned in the post - this was a consistent pattern.

I think that underscores that this really is a transformative contest for the Democratic Party. Obama really does appear to be the future of the party.