Comments on: New AG Should Settle with Stankoski and Stout http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/06/16/new-ag-should-settle-with-stankoski-and-stout/ A Progressive Political Playground Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:41:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Joseph http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/06/16/new-ag-should-settle-with-stankoski-and-stout/#comment-101403 Joseph Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:21:16 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4075#comment-101403 That's kind of what I was getting at... are they asking for more in their settlement than they could be awarded if they did go to trial? Also- I believe both women still work in the AG's office, no? That’s kind of what I was getting at… are they asking for more in their settlement than they could be awarded if they did go to trial?

Also- I believe both women still work in the AG’s office, no?

]]> By: Modern Esquire http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/06/16/new-ag-should-settle-with-stankoski-and-stout/#comment-101401 Modern Esquire Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:14:47 +0000 http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4075#comment-101401 1) Settlements aren't governed by caps, per se, but people generally don't settle for things they wouldn't have to pay at trial. 2)It's unclear what damages are covered by the $400k request. My only guess is that most of their damages are non-economic (medical, counseling, lost wages, lost benefits, lost promotions, etc.) 1) Settlements aren’t governed by caps, per se, but people generally don’t settle for things they wouldn’t have to pay at trial.
2)It’s unclear what damages are covered by the $400k request. My only guess is that most of their damages are non-economic (medical, counseling, lost wages, lost benefits, lost promotions, etc.)

]]>