<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pollsters Not Capturing Key Obama Demo:  Cell Phone Only Voters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cellphone only people strongly support Obama &#171; Majorman&#8217;s Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-105130</link>
		<dc:creator>Cellphone only people strongly support Obama &#171; Majorman&#8217;s Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4269#comment-105130</guid>
		<description>[...] few interesting blog posts on this topic here, here, and here.Â  Now do you understand why the Obama campaign used the text message to announce Senator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few interesting blog posts on this topic here, here, and here.Â  Now do you understand why the Obama campaign used the text message to announce Senator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-102374</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4269#comment-102374</guid>
		<description>You may be right Modern, but Obama seems to be motivating new young voters (who might be cell only) way more than John Kerry. Guess we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right Modern, but Obama seems to be motivating new young voters (who might be cell only) way more than John Kerry. Guess we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Esquire</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-102373</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4269#comment-102373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been hearing the &quot;cell phone&quot; poll bias meme for some time now.  I distinctly remember people claiming that Kerry would do better than the polls showed for that very reason.

The main problem I have with this theory is that most younger people only have cell phones-  a demographic with a significantly lower turnout rate than almost any other demographic (except unregistered voters:)).  

For that reason, I think the entirely theoretical &quot;cell phone&quot; demographic bias is highly unlikely to create a 2-3% bias among all registered voters or likely voters.

The quantification of the bias is largely a matter of pure speculation, and one that doesn&#039;t seem to reflect the possible bias.

Recent studies estimate that only 16% of American households are wireless only.  That means that the wireless family has to be almost exclusively pro-Obama (at rates that mirror his support in the African-American population) to creat a 2 to 3% bias.

In other words, even assuming this speculative estimation is even factually valid, the supposed bias isn&#039;t significant enough to say that it isn&#039;t already considered or falls within any given poll&#039;s margin of error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been hearing the &#8220;cell phone&#8221; poll bias meme for some time now.  I distinctly remember people claiming that Kerry would do better than the polls showed for that very reason.</p>
<p>The main problem I have with this theory is that most younger people only have cell phones-  a demographic with a significantly lower turnout rate than almost any other demographic (except unregistered voters:)).  </p>
<p>For that reason, I think the entirely theoretical &#8220;cell phone&#8221; demographic bias is highly unlikely to create a 2-3% bias among all registered voters or likely voters.</p>
<p>The quantification of the bias is largely a matter of pure speculation, and one that doesn&#8217;t seem to reflect the possible bias.</p>
<p>Recent studies estimate that only 16% of American households are wireless only.  That means that the wireless family has to be almost exclusively pro-Obama (at rates that mirror his support in the African-American population) to creat a 2 to 3% bias.</p>
<p>In other words, even assuming this speculative estimation is even factually valid, the supposed bias isn&#8217;t significant enough to say that it isn&#8217;t already considered or falls within any given poll&#8217;s margin of error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/07/14/pollsters-not-capturing-key-obama-demo-cell-phone-only-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-102359</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=4269#comment-102359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d ditch the home phone in a minute if I had reliable cellular coverage.  And, I live less than 150 feet from a U.S. Highway.

Can you hear me now?  No?  Darn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d ditch the home phone in a minute if I had reliable cellular coverage.  And, I live less than 150 feet from a U.S. Highway.</p>
<p>Can you hear me now?  No?  Darn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
