Comments on: Stankoski and Stout Should Take the AG Office’s Offer (and then fire their lawyer)

By: J-Dog

J-Dog — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:51:20 +0000

Perhaps these chick-babes could go work for Sarah Palin. Their babbling would appear to complement her quite well, given Sara’s recent grand pronouncements of her greatness!

By: Sara Miller

Sara Miller — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:02:50 +0000

What you don’t realize is…. if these girls didn’t come forward and step up againest the “The Top Cop” of the State of Ohio, the taxpayers would be paying for the pleasures of his family and friends till 2010. And not to mention if for some reason he would get re-elected for another 4 years!!! I suggest if you don’t know the whole story, don’t put your two cents in.

By: Ben Keeler

Ben Keeler — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:24:34 +0000

I pretty much agree.

By: eric

eric — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:14:20 +0000

I’m still shaking my head over the irony of their being named “persons of the year”. Couple that with the laughable cover and I’m wondering if this was a cynical commentary on the part of Columbus Monthly. After reading the article, I’m almost convinced of that. However, I don’t believe this was the case. That may be the last of the few Columbus Monthly magazines I every buy.

By: Marcy

Marcy — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:13:03 +0000

I don’t like to see anyone sexually harrassed – men or women but I still don’t understand how a “neighbor” (Vanessa Stout) that has no high school diploma, DUI charges and a record for retail theft can get a job like this? Aaah does she want us to really think they felt sorry for her, without any other thoughts going on in the back of their
minds. You scatch my back and I will scratch yours???

By: Joseph

Joseph — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:46:30 +0000

The longer they wait, the more attorney fees they will be racking up.

By: Nifty Lawrence

Nifty Lawrence — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:24:25 +0000

How much of the $200K would go towards their attorney fees?

How much of it would be swallowed up by taxes (including their being bumped up to a higher tax bracket for the year)?

By: Heather

Heather — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:38:41 +0000

Couldn’t have said it better myself… and it’s unfortunate behavior because there are very legit cases of harassment on both men and women; this just makes a public mockery of it.

By: LisaRenee

LisaRenee — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:12:20 +0000

I don’t disagree with you that after seeing the cover of the magazine, my thoughts changed a bit on this one. It’s one thing to really be a victim, it’s another to pose on a cover…

It’d be interesting to know if they were paid to do the cover and if so, how much.

By: jeremiah

jeremiah — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:50:31 +0000

That’s what I can’t understand is why are my tax dollars paying these girls. I think the wages of Dann and Guiterriez should be garnished for a decade. And take the damn thing to trial – whatever happened to personal responsibility??

I also happen to know Cindy is a long-time skank who has been in similar situations since that 11th grade education ended. She finally hit the bigtime – in so many ways.