<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stupak is the Pitts.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/11/20/stupak-is-the-pitts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/11/20/stupak-is-the-pitts/</link>
	<description>A Progressive Political Playground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyO</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/11/20/stupak-is-the-pitts/comment-page-1/#comment-111602</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7564#comment-111602</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t want my tax dollars being used to prop up corrupt governments or fight needless and perhaps illegal wars, but I can&#039;t just send a note with my tax receipt saying these things and expect to be taken seriously. On the other hand it&#039;s the &quot;right&quot; of people not to have their tax dollars fund abortions. I mean really, both these issues are (supposedly, according to anti-choice people) nearly identical- money for the murder of other human beings. That&#039;s an argument made on their own terms of course, and in reality I reject those terms outright, but I&#039;d sure like to hear an answer to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#39;t want my tax dollars being used to prop up corrupt governments or fight needless and perhaps illegal wars, but I can&#39;t just send a note with my tax receipt saying these things and expect to be taken seriously. On the other hand it&#39;s the &#8220;right&#8221; of people not to have their tax dollars fund abortions. I mean really, both these issues are (supposedly, according to anti-choice people) nearly identical- money for the murder of other human beings. That&#39;s an argument made on their own terms of course, and in reality I reject those terms outright, but I&#39;d sure like to hear an answer to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyO</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/11/20/stupak-is-the-pitts/comment-page-1/#comment-110017</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7564#comment-110017</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t want my tax dollars being used to prop up corrupt governments or fight needless and perhaps illegal wars, but I can&#039;t just send a note with my tax receipt saying these things and expect to be taken seriously. On the other hand it&#039;s the &quot;right&quot; of people not to have their tax dollars fund abortions. I mean really, both these issues are (supposedly, according to anti-choice people) nearly identical- money for the murder of other human beings. That&#039;s an argument made on their own terms of course, and in reality I reject those terms outright, but I&#039;d sure like to hear an answer to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#39;t want my tax dollars being used to prop up corrupt governments or fight needless and perhaps illegal wars, but I can&#39;t just send a note with my tax receipt saying these things and expect to be taken seriously. On the other hand it&#39;s the &#8220;right&#8221; of people not to have their tax dollars fund abortions. I mean really, both these issues are (supposedly, according to anti-choice people) nearly identical- money for the murder of other human beings. That&#39;s an argument made on their own terms of course, and in reality I reject those terms outright, but I&#39;d sure like to hear an answer to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/11/20/stupak-is-the-pitts/comment-page-1/#comment-109923</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7564#comment-109923</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kelley!  You don&#039;t have to be a &quot;guest&quot;.  You have an account now.  Feel free to fire away with bloggy goodness.  ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks like there is a compromise in the Senate bill that is much less restrictive than Stupak-Pitts.  It looks like the firestorm - which we here at PB joined in on - may have worked to bring the house bill closer in line with Hyde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kelley!  You don&#39;t have to be a &#8220;guest&#8221;.  You have an account now.  Feel free to fire away with bloggy goodness.  <img src='http://www.plunderbund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It looks like there is a compromise in the Senate bill that is much less restrictive than Stupak-Pitts.  It looks like the firestorm &#8211; which we here at PB joined in on &#8211; may have worked to bring the house bill closer in line with Hyde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
