<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Powerful Men Not Get Married?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/</link>
	<description>All Politics.  All Ohio.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-112302</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-112302</guid>
		<description>powerful men are more likely to marry women who have gotten by on their looks more than their brains or sincerity.  Such a wife  knows this, so she is more suspicious about her husband leaving her for those same reasons as she ages.  This sets up a feedback loop of negative emotions between the two.  This builds to a tipping point, and the woman is set on having a pre-emptive divorce on her own terms, rather than her husbands terms.  In the case of Tiger Woods, he could not have done more to wreck his marriage than he has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>powerful men are more likely to marry women who have gotten by on their looks more than their brains or sincerity.  Such a wife  knows this, so she is more suspicious about her husband leaving her for those same reasons as she ages.  This sets up a feedback loop of negative emotions between the two.  This builds to a tipping point, and the woman is set on having a pre-emptive divorce on her own terms, rather than her husbands terms.  In the case of Tiger Woods, he could not have done more to wreck his marriage than he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-112259</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-112259</guid>
		<description>Men should not marry at all.   Especially men with money.  Women are nearly always the ones who file for divorce because they always get the assets, his money and his children, and hence the gravy train.  Men, if you love someone, then live with them, but don&#039;t make any agreement (like a marriage) which binds you but not her.  And under no circumstances give an American woman children; the chances are better than even that you will not get to raise the children for whom you pay, while they are poisoned against you.  This is the way it works most of the time.  Don&#039;t do it guys, just don&#039;t do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men should not marry at all.   Especially men with money.  Women are nearly always the ones who file for divorce because they always get the assets, his money and his children, and hence the gravy train.  Men, if you love someone, then live with them, but don&#39;t make any agreement (like a marriage) which binds you but not her.  And under no circumstances give an American woman children; the chances are better than even that you will not get to raise the children for whom you pay, while they are poisoned against you.  This is the way it works most of the time.  Don&#39;t do it guys, just don&#39;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottpullins</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-111317</link>
		<dc:creator>scottpullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-111317</guid>
		<description>good one!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good one!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottpullins</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110409</link>
		<dc:creator>scottpullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110409</guid>
		<description>good one!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good one!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atalkingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110406</link>
		<dc:creator>atalkingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110406</guid>
		<description>it used to be more acceptable for powerful men to have girlfriends on the side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bob Hope slept with more women than any 3 rock stars.&lt;br&gt;and he stayed married for about 70 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and probably countless professional athletes have had some reliable hookups in different cities.&lt;br&gt;it doesn&#039;t mean it is right, or should continue. &lt;br&gt;but it doesn&#039;t have to automatically end in divorce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it used to be more acceptable for powerful men to have girlfriends on the side.</p>
<p>Bob Hope slept with more women than any 3 rock stars.<br />and he stayed married for about 70 years.</p>
<p>and probably countless professional athletes have had some reliable hookups in different cities.<br />it doesn&#39;t mean it is right, or should continue. <br />but it doesn&#39;t have to automatically end in divorce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110404</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110404</guid>
		<description>I think rich/powerful/successful guys have more &lt;em&gt;opportunities&lt;/em&gt; (or you can call them &quot;temptations&quot;) than &quot;normal&quot; guys; it&#039;s the nature of how humans work sexually.  The only other difference between guys like Tiger and some guy on my street is that fewer people care about some &quot;average Joe&#039;s&quot; infidelity.  We&#039;re all human, and susceptible to giving in to temptation, I think the rich guys are just tempted more often than anybody else.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, let&#039;s be honest here - I&#039;m a married middle class guy living in a middle class neighborhood in a non-descript job.  I don&#039;t have extras from Nip/Tuck making themselves obviously sexually available to me.  Hell, not even the cute undergrad girls we usually have interning at the office send up any flags.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, people are individuals, and individuals often deviate from &quot;average&quot;.  So it&#039;s no surprise that there are rich and powerful men who are committed family men, and deadbeats who cheat like crazy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the question of why we don&#039;t see the same pattern of behavior as frequently in women... I think a large part of it goes back to the differences in the patterns that matter to men and women on a biological level when selecting mates.  As a gross generalization, there&#039;s more incentive biologically for women to be monogamous than men, largely because the &lt;em&gt;biological&lt;/em&gt; investment required by women to pass on their genetic code is much &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; larger than that for men.  A woman is unable to reproduce for a long time after conceiving, so it pays to be selective (even if it&#039;s not a part of the conscious thought process), while that is not at all the case for men.  Again, obviously people are individuals, and there are situations where having multiple sexual partners is biologically advantageous to women... usually when the 2nd partner is a &quot;better provider&quot; than the 1st.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is always a touchy topic, because it&#039;s difficult to talk about biological influences on sexual behavior without people interpreting your statements to be sexist (&quot;women are all gold-diggers who only select mates based on their ability to &#039;provide&#039; and &#039;protect&#039;?  How dare you!&quot;), despite the fact that what those arguments imply about the &quot;average&quot; male isn&#039;t particularly flattering either (we prefer young curvy women because they will be more fertile, and tend to be philandering in order to maximize the distribution of genetic code).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my take on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rich/powerful/successful guys have more <em>opportunities</em> (or you can call them &#8220;temptations&#8221;) than &#8220;normal&#8221; guys; it&#39;s the nature of how humans work sexually.  The only other difference between guys like Tiger and some guy on my street is that fewer people care about some &#8220;average Joe&#39;s&#8221; infidelity.  We&#39;re all human, and susceptible to giving in to temptation, I think the rich guys are just tempted more often than anybody else.</p>
<p>I mean, let&#39;s be honest here &#8211; I&#39;m a married middle class guy living in a middle class neighborhood in a non-descript job.  I don&#39;t have extras from Nip/Tuck making themselves obviously sexually available to me.  Hell, not even the cute undergrad girls we usually have interning at the office send up any flags.</p>
<p>Of course, people are individuals, and individuals often deviate from &#8220;average&#8221;.  So it&#39;s no surprise that there are rich and powerful men who are committed family men, and deadbeats who cheat like crazy.</p>
<p>As for the question of why we don&#39;t see the same pattern of behavior as frequently in women&#8230; I think a large part of it goes back to the differences in the patterns that matter to men and women on a biological level when selecting mates.  As a gross generalization, there&#39;s more incentive biologically for women to be monogamous than men, largely because the <em>biological</em> investment required by women to pass on their genetic code is much <em>much</em> larger than that for men.  A woman is unable to reproduce for a long time after conceiving, so it pays to be selective (even if it&#39;s not a part of the conscious thought process), while that is not at all the case for men.  Again, obviously people are individuals, and there are situations where having multiple sexual partners is biologically advantageous to women&#8230; usually when the 2nd partner is a &#8220;better provider&#8221; than the 1st.</p>
<p>This is always a touchy topic, because it&#39;s difficult to talk about biological influences on sexual behavior without people interpreting your statements to be sexist (&#8220;women are all gold-diggers who only select mates based on their ability to &#39;provide&#39; and &#39;protect&#39;?  How dare you!&#8221;), despite the fact that what those arguments imply about the &#8220;average&#8221; male isn&#39;t particularly flattering either (we prefer young curvy women because they will be more fertile, and tend to be philandering in order to maximize the distribution of genetic code).</p>
<p>Just my take on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffhess</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110403</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffhess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110403</guid>
		<description>Shalom Amber,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I confess that I know nothing about Steadman other than that he&#039;s been Oprah&#039;s gentleman for some 18 years. What does he do? Why do you think they haven&#039;t married?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My bet is that Oprah is one smart woman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as the success of their long-term relationship, what do we know about it other than the fact that they have both managed to keep their personal lives under the radar?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B&#039;shalom,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shalom Amber,</p>
<p>I confess that I know nothing about Steadman other than that he&#39;s been Oprah&#39;s gentleman for some 18 years. What does he do? Why do you think they haven&#39;t married?</p>
<p>My bet is that Oprah is one smart woman.</p>
<p>As far as the success of their long-term relationship, what do we know about it other than the fact that they have both managed to keep their personal lives under the radar?</p>
<p>B&#39;shalom,</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110401</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110401</guid>
		<description>Well, Oprah has managed to have long-term relationships with Steadman and with Gayle! Sounds successful to me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Oprah has managed to have long-term relationships with Steadman and with Gayle! Sounds successful to me <img src='http://www.plunderbund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110400</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110400</guid>
		<description>how did i know this would be the thread that took off today?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ps - i was married for my dashing looks and charming smile...not to mention my razor wit and humble nature.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how did i know this would be the thread that took off today?</p>
<p>ps &#8211; i was married for my dashing looks and charming smile&#8230;not to mention my razor wit and humble nature.  <img src='http://www.plunderbund.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffhess</title>
		<link>http://www.plunderbund.com/2009/12/03/should-powerful-men-not-get-married/comment-page-1/#comment-110399</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffhess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plunderbund.com/?p=7996#comment-110399</guid>
		<description>Shalom Amber,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I use the word successful, I mean top 5 percent in the world successful, I mean Olympic medalist successful, I mean the kind of success where if someone mentions your area of expertise, your name is going to come up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean that level of success where you have access to the power the command the response you desire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Compared to my own abysmal performance on the golf course, anyone on the PGA tour is a successful golfer. Compared to Tiger Woods, those other golfers aren&#039;t. That&#039;s the difference we&#039;re talking about when we look at people like Oprah Winfrey. Have you ever considered why it is that she and Steadman have never married? She is both successful and powerful in every sense of the words that matters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;B&#039;shalom,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shalom Amber,</p>
<p>When I use the word successful, I mean top 5 percent in the world successful, I mean Olympic medalist successful, I mean the kind of success where if someone mentions your area of expertise, your name is going to come up.</p>
<p>I mean that level of success where you have access to the power the command the response you desire.</p>
<p>Compared to my own abysmal performance on the golf course, anyone on the PGA tour is a successful golfer. Compared to Tiger Woods, those other golfers aren&#39;t. That&#39;s the difference we&#39;re talking about when we look at people like Oprah Winfrey. Have you ever considered why it is that she and Steadman have never married? She is both successful and powerful in every sense of the words that matters.</p>
<p>B&#39;shalom,</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

