Comments on: David Yost on Abortion – mum’s the word!

By: guest

guest — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:10:00 +0000

dave yost has 5 siblings and 2 parents and yet only one brother and his dad contributed to his campaign-could it be because he is anti-gay and his right wing leanings are an embarrassment to the moderate family where he grew up

By: Vincinzano

Vincinzano — Sat, 01 May 2010 04:11:21 +0000

hhhhmmmm, still trying to figure out how believing that something should be illegal implies that you have a punishment in mind. Don't you have to take step one first(banning the particular crime) prior to taking the second(imposing a punishment)? Furthermore, you asked what significance Yost's stance on abortion had when applied to his particular office. The fact is that a person's ethics and responsibility especially in the public sphere can be traced back to his beliefs regarding the dignity of the human person, from conception till natural death. The fact that Yost opposes abortion tells me alot about his responsibility. Since he is firmly grounded in a strong moral ethic on this most fundamental issue of abortion which regards human life at its origin, I believe that this will manifest itself in his dealings in other matters, whether they directly apply to abortion or not. Thus, Yost's stance on abortion truly does bear upon the discharge of his duties in the political sphere, whether that be as attorney general or some other government official.

By: mvirenicus

mvirenicus — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:19:07 +0000

i'd be far more likely to accept tim's version of an event than any version proffered by what passes for a “journalist” in the msm. i once heard it said of msm “journalists” that they travel from their suburban climate controlled homes in their climate controlled vehicles to a climate controlled office where they “report” on subjects of absolutely no relevance to anybody.

By: midgeweber

midgeweber — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:18:42 +0000

How much is truth and how much is it a reporters enhancement?

By: MattCS

MattCS — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:14:37 +0000

Ouch, sounds like he just didn't like the fact he got burned. Hard.

I'd like to see more reporters use that tactic. Trap the candidate and KEEP asking until you show that the candidate can't give an answer.

Make the fools show that they are really fools, not an intelligent person that they are dressed up as.

And in my opinion a candidate should be able to answer ANY question thrown at them about anything on their campaign information. If it involves your platform you should be able to speak about your position and ideals for a while in detail.

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:02:31 +0000

Fear and loathing, baby. Fear and loathing.

Maybe David should remove that bit from his campaign lit?