OH-16: Boccieri’s opponent has a Rand Paul moment. Calls civil rights “a local issue.”
(HT: Think Progress)
Here’s some video from yesterday’s unofficial debate between John Boccieri and his opponent at his opponent’s “town hall” event.
The federal government needs to get out of the way and have local governments on civil rights. Says its not a federal issue…
RENACCI: [...] A lot of the problems you’re talking about are local issues. And I’m also a firm believer that the federal government and our Constitution was based on freedom, and was based on the freedoms that our number one goal of our military is freedom. We need to get our federal government out of the way and we need to allow our local governments to become more involved in many of the issues you’re talking about. I don’t believe these are federal issues to come down. I believe the federal government’s number one goal is to protect our freedoms. So the answer to your question is I believe a lot of things need to come back to the local level, and I believe things like you’re talking about do need to go back to the local level. And they need to be looked at in the cities. I was a mayor of my community. I think those are important ways of looking at all that. It’s not the federal government’s job.
What little coherence I could discern from Renacci’s rambling answer is, of course, entirely WRONG.
Perhaps Jim Rennaci should read the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution sometime:
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
…
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
The United States Constitution, through the 14th Amendment, not only makes civil rights a federal issue, but it specifically makes the body Mr. Rennaci is running to be a member of, Congress, responsible for making sure that local governments do not infringe the civil rights of our fellow citizens.
But beyond the demonstration of Mr. Rennaci’s constitutional ignorance, there’s a historical ignorance that the gentleman who asked the question is acutely aware. There’s a reason why we haven’t entrusted civil rights as solely a local matter.
Related Stories
- Outspoken Buckeye Institute promotes Issue 2 while opposing civil rights
- Ohio landlord fights Ohio Civil Rights Commission over “White Only” sign at pool
- Despite what you’ve heard, Issue 2 failure has no effect on state, local budgets
- SB5/Issue 2′s pension pick-up restrictions tie the hands of local leaders
- County Sheriff endorses Issue 2, saying it’s time to get spending under control, then calls for tax hike for his budget
-
Modern Esquire
-
Anonymous
Get Email Updates
PB Twitter Feed
- New version of Sh*t John Kasich says is up and includes Parkinson's shake http://t.co/BUCHl2DT @tainther3
- @tainther3 encoding a new version and adding it. ;-)
- As promised. We give you "Shit John Kasich Says: State of the State Edition". Enjoy! http://t.co/JoBcRVqQ
- @joshualyman It's easier to vote for Romney when it's nonbinding.
- RT @joshualyman: So Mitt's won two contests today by a 38/39% margin? Way to unite behind your frontrunner, Republicans. #p2
- RT @jesseltaylor: Shorter tonight: the 5,600 people who voted in a nonbinding caucus in Maine have saved Mitt's campaign.
- RT @thinkprogress: NEW POLL: 57% of Catholic voters approve of Obama's new birth control policy, just 29% oppose http://t.co/oqVIQXdb
- @Notgvn not in this one, but that's a great idea! lol
- Post Tease: Just edited an epic video of John Kasich's State of the State. 90 minutes down to 6 minutes of the best stuff. You will like!
- RT @BarackObama: January was the 23rd consecutive month of job growth: http://t.co/Zn3KOQrC
Advertisement
Advertisement





