It is better to remain silent and suffer that people might think you a fool than it is to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

Senate President Niehaus should really just stop talking because he keeps digging a deeper and deeper hole on the retroactive raises and how it reflects why Issue 2 is just bad policy.  Niehaus’ latest spin in today’s Cleveland Plain Dealer is that these raises actually are entirely consistent with the values embodied in Issue 2.  So that I can’t be accused of misrepresenting him, here’s what the Plain Dealer reported Niehaus said:

Niehaus said the raises are consistent with the spirit of SB 5, which replaces automatic pay increases based on time served with raises based on performance.

“These are all performance-based increases. So it’s consistent,” he said. “There is nothing in Senate Bill 5 that prevents anyone from getting raises.”

In saying that, Niehaus confirmed what critics of “merit pay” have been saying all year.  The Senate doesn’t have any written “merit pay” policy.  Anyone reviewing the raises would be hard pressed to articulate a policy that explains them.  There seems to be little rhyme or reason for who got a 4% raise versus 33%.  Except that by and large, the biggest raises went to mostly Republican staffers.  (Yes, it appears that after our post hit the news, the Democratic staffers got approved raises, too.  We couldn’t report the Democratic raises because unlike the Republican raises, the Democratic ones weren’t reflected in the most recent payroll records we examined, so we had no way of knowing about them until the Republican Senate caucus felt the need to push back.)

But there is one commonality that explains these raises, they all went to the top staffers who were the most politically connected to the leadership of their respective partisan caucus (i.e.- the “management.”)  Did the Democratic chief-of-staff and their Communicator Director deserve a raise?  In my opinion, absolutely.  Despite having only 10 of 33 members in the body, the Democratic Senate caucus has been unbelieveably more effective this year in executing a communication strategy that demonstrates an unified Democratic message on major policy issues in the day.  They have driven coverage on the budget, SB 5, and other legislative initiatives.  And if their Republican counterparts are getting “merit” raises for their achievement of handling the difficult task of pass legislation when your party holds 23 of the 33 seats in the body.  The Senate Democrats believe there should be a rising tide for all boats; they don’t believe in just giving raises at the top and defending it as merit pay, as Niehaus does.

The Senate Democratic Caucus didn’t support the Kasich budget or SB 5.  And they fought like hell on both.  Everyone seems to forget that when SB 5 was introduced, everyone said it was introduced their because of the sizeable majority in that body as opposed to the House would give the bill momentum and assured quick passage.  Instead, SB 5 almost didn’t make it out of the Senate, and it took the Senate majority caucus to remove members of a key committee to make that happen.  The Senate Democratic Caucus believes that teachers, firefighters, and police officers and all of Ohio’s working class and middle class deserve a raise, but they don’t get to set the policy of the Senate or the State unless they are put in the majority.  So, they took what raises they could get approved by the Republican majority leadership.

As such, these raises are more of a political problem for the Republicans because if this is “merit pay,” then it reeks of cronyism.  Is Niehaus really suggesting that the legislative aides (holla L.A.s!) of the members of the committees that had to deal with SB 5 and the budget don’t merit a raise after all the long hours of hearings, meetings, etc. they undertook so far this year already? Please.

If this is what merit pay will look like, then it’s a pretty indefensible system that seem ripe for abuse and favoritism.  Thanks for proving us right, Senate President Niehaus!

Evangelize!
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Anonymous

    Keep talking Niehaus – remember, you have to explain all these intracacies to the great unwashed.

  • Anonymous

    I worked for the state of Ohio for 31 years. I know through experience just how corrupt “management” is. Favoritism, cronyism and nepotism run rampant. Jobs are created for friends and relatives. The double dipping that is criticized is mostly done by management. SB5 will only increase that corruption.

  • Anonymous

    Funny how the Republican raises have been in place for two months but the Democrats only got raises after Plunderbund exposed it. Is that how pay for performance will work, too?

  • Anonymous

    Judging by local comment boards, people are rightfully outraged. The hardcore Kasich supporters explain it away though, as expected. My local newspaper referenced Plunderbund, that was pretty sweet. I thought they had not been following your site, they didn’t report on any of the Ohio Republicans shenanigans with drunk driving and domestic violence.

  • Anonymous

    Judging by local comment boards, people are rightfully outraged. The hardcore Kasich supporters explain it away though, as expected. My local newspaper referenced Plunderbund, that was pretty sweet. I thought they had not been following your site, they didn’t report on any of the Ohio Republicans shenanigans with drunk driving and domestic violence.

  • Anonymous

    Do we know how many Democrats got raises and how large those raises are? Other than the fact brought out in this piece that Democrats aren’t guilty of hypocrisy because they don’t believe teachers and police officers should be taking a hit, this “both sides do it” spin seems too convenient. I want to know how the raises compare.

    Also, could you check out this sentence? It doesn’t hang together:
    “ And if their Republican counterparts are getting “merit” raises for their achievement of handling the difficult task of pass legislation when your party holds 23 of the 33 seats in the body. ”

    Thanks.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, the Cleveland Plainly Republican barely mentioned Legislators Gone Wild either. I think they did a teensy weensy piece on Mecklenborg resigning. Nothing about Martin or Jordan.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, the Cleveland Plainly Republican barely mentioned Legislators Gone Wild either. I think they did a teensy weensy piece on Mecklenborg resigning. Nothing about Martin or Jordan.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, the Cleveland Plainly Republican barely mentioned Legislators Gone Wild either. I think they did a teensy weensy piece on Mecklenborg resigning. Nothing about Martin or Jordan.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/GK4FEGNHSJVH5DA5TFOGEBUXQQ Andy

    I don’t know about any other staffers but whoever is paid to put the spin on Niehaus’ lies deserves a huge raise. After all, it takes a special talent to make up those whoppers. :-)

  • Anonymous

    1 – yes, we do now. based on our reporting, media outlets were provided with a spreadsheet showing 19 individuals who will be receiving raises. Here is a link. Anyone with “Min” in their title is minority (or Democratic) staff. Judge for yourself whose raises are bigger.

    Also: this list came out this week. But our reporting was based on state payroll data which shows that Democrats have not seen a single penny increase in their paychecks. Republican staff started receiving their retroactive pay increase with the 7/13/11 payroll. If this was supposed to be about “merit”, why did the Rs get raises at the beginning of the fiscal year while Capri Cafaro was reportedly continuing to beg for her staff to get the same treatment for two months, and it only happened after this story broke and got picked up by every news outlet in the state (and some national)?

    2 – I can’t copy edit Modern. I think I know what he was trying to say, but quite often his brain works faster than his fingers.

  • KAF68

    Sounds like my newspaper too, the Springfield News-Sun.  These local newspapers are more interested in boosterism for local politicians and businesses (they pay the bills after all)  than they are about journalism.  The same thing applies to local TV news programs.  Most Ohioans know next to nothing about state politics thanks to these local news outlets.  Does anyone know an Ohio newspaper that actually prints the voting records of state senators and representatives?  But that would be giving citizens too much information, wouldn’t it?  It’s much better to just rely on the editorial page endorsements for  (mostly Republican) incumbents when voting time rolls around.  

  • Fotogirlcb2002

    Just how do we know if they deserved these raises?
    It becomes more clear everyday this fight isnt about money….its about power.
    The people if this state can not possibly believe they are governing well.
    How can you give such rewards in a budget crisis time?
    Obviously there isnt one ! Unless you are a state employee.
    I would love to know what their benefits are also. 

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:


Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!