From the category archives:

Commentary

At what point does the Dispatch lose all journalistic credibility?

The entire “bust” at the Governor’s Mansion started by a letter intercepted by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections written by an inmate to his wife.  Nobody disputes this.

According to my sources familiar with the letter (i.e. people who actually have SEEN the document), the letter refers to the contraband as a “six pack” and even discussed the price he obtain for getting the item in the prison.

At the time, officials at the DRC informed the Highway Patrol investigating the matter that the term “six pack” is commonly used code word by inmates for… tobacco cigarettes.  I’ve been told that no less than the then DIRECTOR of the Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections told the Patrol that the term and the price mentioned indicated that the item could only be tobacco cigarettes, and not drugs.

Nonetheless, some mid-level managers in the Patrol insisted that the item might be drugs even though there was no evidence to support the conclusion.

So pervasive was the perception that the contraband in question was likely tobacco and not drugs, that even the mid-level Patrol managers who were pushing to do the “bust” detailed in their plan that the first priority upon seeing the inmate’s wife making the planned drop (even though those same officers conceded that there was also a strong likelihood that the intercepted communication never even made it to the inmate’s wife) was to first determine if the item was, in fact, criminally illegal contraband.  A fact that neither the Dispatch or WBNS has reported in their news stories despite the fact that the Dispatch published e-mails on their website that they’ve received pursuant to a public records request that confirms this (see pg. 9).

Even worse, a WBNS reporter actually used an image of the inmate’s letter in a news story last night, but never mentioned that the terms used in it led almost every investigator involved to conclude that there was a strong probability that any stop of the woman would be illegal as there was no criminal conspiracy as the suspected “contraband” was likely tobacco cigarettes.

In fact, the WBNS reporter did not even ACKNOWLEDGE what even the Dispatch has admitted– that the item was likely tobacco and a big reason the “raid” was scrubbed was that it was more likely than the raid itself was illegal than the suspected contraband.

Furthermore, neither the Dispatch, nor WBNS has reported that the organization representing the rank-and-file of the Ohio Highway Patrol has been decrying the politicization of this “bust” by the very mid-level Highway Patrol managers involved who are upset over the Governor’s most recent appointment to Superintendent of the Patrol–something that the Dispatch’s editors have also attempted to castigate at the time.

I’m awaiting further documentation, but I’ve been told that instead of being reassigned for political retribution (as the Dispatch’s media empire has reported) over the thwarted cigarette raid at the Governor’s Mansion, one of the officers involved was being reassigned due to disciplinary misconduct entirely unrelated to the situation at the Governor’s Mansion.  Again, a fact easily ascertainable by a public records request (mine is pending) that the Dispatch organizations would ordinarily examine if they were interested in reporting the full facts of this story.

And what’s worse, here’s an actual quote from the Senate Republican seeking to use his Committee gavel to politicize the issue further as reported by… you guess it, WBNS:

“Here’s what I believe is part of a cover-up to an unwarranted and unnecessary criminal investigation that should have been allowed to have been completed.”  State Sen. Tim Grendell.

Not even Chairman Grendell can blast the Strickland Administration without admitting that “bust” was an unwarranted and unnecessary criminal investigation!

So ridiculous has the situation has gotten than no less than the editorial board of the Cleveland Plain Dealer– a frequent critic of Governor Strickland (more so than even the Dispatch)– has decried the politicization by Republicans and former Patrol managers as being more about settling political scores than anything dealing with genuine law enforcement concerns:

On the evidence to date, however, what’s in play isn’t criminality, but the latest chapter in a settling of Statehouse scores.

It’s one thing for a news organizations to simply get a story wrong, but it’s quite another when two news organizations that share common ownership continue to report a news story in a manner directly contrary to numerous documents in their possession which completely discredit the politically charged inferences and allegations that the organization seems to be on a concerted and systematic campaign to make in the hopes of affecting an upcoming election.

If the Dispatch wishes to be taken seriously as anything other than a Republican propaganda machine, it will end this deliberate and irresponsible cherry picking of the facts and just report the news, the whole news, and nothing but the news. Something the Dispatch has demonstrated a systematic allergic reaction to doing in this instance.

If they won’t do it, I, or someone who actually gets paid to do this for a living, will.

As they say, DEVELOPING…

{ 0 comments }

First, the Dayton Daily News (Kasich tax plan looks more like one more problem for Ohio):

Rep. John Adams, of Sidney (not to be confused with state Rep. Richard Adams, of Miami County) insists that his 10-year plan will actually increase government revenues.

You know the argument he makes: “When the people we chase out of the state (under current tax laws) decide to stay, they will create jobs. The tax base will expand. That’s the way it works in every scenario.”

That, of course, is why Ohio is now rolling in revenue, having adopted a gradual cut in income taxes in 2005.

That’s sarcasm. The 2005 act has not worked any miracles, has it?

Truth is, in Ohio, the property tax — not the income tax — generates the most complaints. Calls for change in income taxes come not so much from the public as from ideological warriors, from conservative movement people who have a one-size-fits-all agenda for every state.

And the truth is that no repeal of the income tax can be done without raising the property taxes.   Heck, you could almost pay for it entirely if the State implemented a State property tax… of course, it would have to double your existing property tax, but it would pay for it.

Then, there’s this item from Cleveland Scene which sounds almost like it was written by yours truly.

{ 1 comment }

I’m going to give you a Madden playbook why John Kasich’s courtship of State Auditor Mary Taylor makes no sense for anyone but John Kasich.  But let’s start with the most obvious point: it is absolute insanity for the Republicans to risk the only Apportionment Board seat they held in 2006 by moving an incumbent who was on track for a relatively safe re-election so that she can run for the non-essentially (from both a political and governing sense) Lt. Governor slot.

It’s is amazingly insane.  Second, if it were a done deal, Kasich wouldn’t first float it through Jon Keeling’s blog and then let the Cleveland Plain Dealer and Columbus Dispatch’s Joe Hallett write about as if it weren’t.  They’d just announced it.

Read Hallett’s column and tell me it doesn’t sound like Hallett isn’t practically serenading for John Kasich’s public political courtship of Mary Taylor.  Kasich is trying to put Taylor on the spot:  join my ticket and help me keep the Tea Bag base from deserting me by November when they realize how I’ve been an anti-establishment phony for the past year, or publicly embarrass me, the Republican standard bearer.  (Most of Kasich’s arguments don’t even make sense.  Taylor could arguably attack Strickland just as easily running for re-election.)

Believe me, if the GOP establishment wanted Taylor to be Kasich’s running mate, Kasich wouldn’t feel the need to put Taylor on the spot so publicly.  It would have been an arranged political marriage and announced, no such speculation has existed in the past.  Kasich is doing this because there is strong resistance in the Republican party to having this ticket, just look at the comments on Keeling’s blog.

Despite Taylor’s claimed fundraising woes, she’s still the only Republican to survive 2006, and nothing has happened since then that has made her more politically vulnerable.  Privately, most Democrats would even agree that Taylor was heavily favored for re-election.

Move her out of the Auditor’s race, and it’s an open seat (Taylor could not even resign in the hopes to make the Republican candidate to replace her the incumbent.  Any such vacancy would be filled by appointment by Governor Strickland.)  Suddenly, Hamilton County David Pepper has more than just a fighting chance for the office.

Who’s the most likely candidate to replace Taylor if she agreed to be Kasich’s running mate?  Well, it sure as hell isn’t Mike DeWine or Matt Dolan.  After all, what political calculation would require Kasich to need the support of Mary Taylor but DeWine as Auditor?

No, the most likely replacement to Taylor would be Josh Mandel, who is currently running for State Treasurer.  This means Kevin Boyce is likely re-elected as opposed to being considered highly vulnerable.

Even with Mandel and his millions in the race, it’s still a very competitive open seat race, and not one where Mandel’s qualifications put him at any unique advantage, either.

There is no way that Taylor leaves the Auditor’s race without making that race more likely for a Democratic takeover as a result.  None.

And if Boyce and Pepper wins, so does Jennifer Brunner.  It would be highly unlikely that any party captures the Auditor’s and Secretary of State’s races in open seat races while losing the gubernatorial race.  Therefore, with Pepper viewed as now likely to win the Auditor’s office, Brunner’s run for Senate isn’t as loaded down with Apportionment Board concerns.

And Jon Husted has to be wondering why he endured all the attacks over his residency only to see the ticket up ended such that his win is viewed as largely irrelevant.  Jennifer Garrison also loses as Democrats can support Strickland and Pepper while sitting on their hands over her.

If there is any hallmark of the Ohio Republican Party is that they tightly control the formation of their statewide tickets before now.  And just last week, ORP Chairman Kevin DeWine saw with justified confidence that his party was likely to win the Secretary of State’s race and Auditor’s office, thus an almost guarantee that they’d keep the Apportionment Board.  If Taylor bolts for Kasich, that is all upended just 41 days until petitions must be filed.

Which is, again, why it would be absolutely insane, both for the Ohio GOP and Taylor personally, for her to join Kasich’s ticket.  That’s why Kasich is resorting to putting his courtship so publicly to put Taylor on the spot.

It’s a huge gamble.  Because either Taylor does this and gives the Democrats a real shot at picking up a crucial seat on the Apportionment Board, or worse, she says no and publicly embarrasses Kasich and make him look incredibly weak.

You cannot look at the idea of Taylor on the ticket and not be reminded of the reason John McCain chose Sarah Palin.  Like Kasich, McCain picked Palin to try to encourage conservative excitement.  Like McCain, Kasich is courting Palin Taylor to present himself as outside the Bush Republican establishment.

If you doubt that there’s lack of enthusiasm for Kasich consider this: the only conservative blogger that has been writing about Kasich at all is his former congressional staffer … from Virginia.  There isn’t a single conservative blogger in Ohio who’s been writing with any excitement for John Kasich.  Not Kyle Sisk, WMD, Bizzyblog, Matt Naugle… none of them. They’ll, at best, write about Strickland, but Kasich is persona non grata.  Among Ohio conservative bloggers, John Kasich is getting a colder reception than Ken Blackwell did.

Chris Redfern has to be nearly drunk in delight at this development.  No matter what Taylor decides, he wins.  If Taylor runs, suddenly Kasich has made the Republican’s most secure Apportionment Board seat a tossup race.  If Taylor doesn’t join the ticket, then Kasich looks incredibly weak amongst his own Republicans.  Regardless, behind the scenes, Republicans are fuming that their frontrunner has created this predicament.

{ 4 comments }

ROFL. Felt like a good time to recycle these. Just because. Plus I love me some juxtaposts!

john.he.is

-

will.i.am

{ 0 comments }

Much speculation has been surrounding McCain and how he will not only climb out of his doldrums of a week (hell week, really) and maybe offset Obama’s planned speech in Berlin. Many have been talking of a VP pick. Latest fuel for the fire involves our own buckeye state. Taegan Goddard has this:

Will McCain pick his running mate on Thursday?

Could it be former Rep. Rob Portman (R-OH)? Or perhaps it’s former Rep. John Kasich (R-OH)?

I think either of these picks would be just fabulous. Big time ho hum appeal. I hope he does do this, though I doubt they’d sink to this level of desperation. Let Obama have his overseas trip you dared him to do. Haha. We got miles to go before we sleep.

Surprise!

Where my Cbus insider peeps at?

{ 2 comments }

John McCain is a supposed “straight talker”. He even has a “Straight Talk Express” (bus and plane). When it comes to his military record, he’s neither straight talker or straight shooter it seems. The questions that his campaign doesn’t want to answer, let alone be asked, could easily be dismissed.

All it would take is for the Senator to sign Standard Form 180. I will provide a link below to this form in blank format so the campaign can easily find it upon reading this post.

Standard Form 180 (372 KB pdf)

Everyone on the right should be familiar with this form. It’s the one they bombarded John Kerry with requests to sign so they could dig into his military record. It was important back in 2005, I figure it just as important now. Or am I missing a rule of engagement here?

Hell, we may as well put up a clock to count the days, hours, and minutes until he signs. Just like they did. ;-)

-

I trust those on the right will follow me in my quest given their penchant to do so in 2004 and 2005.

Like both Barack Obama and Wesley Clark, we think you served your country honorably. But like John Kerry in 2004, we’d really rather you prove it. Thanks very much.

{ 2 comments }

Eric wrote this earlier today in reaction to Obama’s speech about race.

I got the sense today that Barack Obama was tired. Tired of the hatred and fear-mongering insanity that has gripped not just Republicans, but Democrats as well. I know I get tired when I have to endure the same types of slurs I saw used against blacks in the south now retooled to attack anyone of a Middle Eastern heritage or having a name that is not familiar to the average Anglo-Saxon Caucasoid. I get tired when I see the same type of fear and ignorance used against blacks in the south retooled to attack two men or two women who happen to fall in love and have the audacity to want to live their lives in the same way other Americans do. I get really tired when I see this country become bastardized into something that it was never intended to be.

I’m tired too. Tired of Democrats trying to slyly blow the old racist Southern Strategy dogwhistles in a way that would have made George Wallace proud. Tired of right wing attacks perpetrated on fear and loathing – and tired of some Democrats co-opting that message. I’m tired of the right-wing blogosphere manufacturing lies out of whole cloth, even while staring evidence against those claims square in the face. I’m tired of being called a “cultist” because I prefer one candidate’s message and policy positions over another’s. I’m tired of people taking a statement of clear facts (Clinton’s support from racist voters was greater than her margin of victory in Ohio) and turning it into the fabrication “all Clinton supporters are racist.”

I’m tired of responding to attacks intended to leverage racism being called “playing the race card”. I’m tired of encouraging the poor and downtrodden to stand up for themselves in the face of massive exploitation being called “fomenting a class war”. I’m tired of assholes and jerks who will say anything in order to protect their privilege, or the privilege of others.

I’m tired of people ignoring plain facts in favor of discredited and disproven dogmatic ideology.

I’m tired. Worn down. Like an old millstone.

And then Obama steps up, and gives a speech that reminds me of the stakes. That reminds me that the struggle to fight thru the fatigue is worth it. We can overcome. We shall overcome.

So while we still live in a world scarred by racism and sexism, homophobia and islamophobia, where the evisceration of worker’s rights is called a “right to work” and it’s your fault your job was outsourced to another country and you are on public assistance, we can, and will build a better, stronger America. I’ll get on that rope and pull; but I can’t do it alone. It will take people of all faiths – and no faith. It will take people of all colors, sexes, genders, and orientations. It will take people of differing beliefs but common purpose; perhaps even with different concepts of how to achieve the goals of equality. It will take Obama supporters, Clinton supporters, and heck – even McCain supporters.

So what say you? Do you embrace hate and divisiveness? Or do you embrace hope for equality? As we’ve seen, nearly 50 years after the civil rights movement, and nearly 150 after the Civil War, we still have a long ways to go towards a world where race really doesn’t matter, and you are judged purely by the content of your character. But we can take an important step right now; not by electing Barack Obama, but by refusing to leverage his race against him (or Clinton’s gender against her), and refusing to stand silently by when others do the same. For while I strongly feel that Obama is the best candidate for the Presidency, I will not begrudge him losing a fair election decided on the merits of the positions of the candidates involved. That is democracy. What is going on now is not democracy – it’s crass fear mongering. We like to claim we are the world leader in freedom and democracy. Now it’s time to back up that talk with some action.

{ 3 comments }

Lessig 08

by Brian on February 20, 2008 · Comments

Lots of videos, I know, but they’re just too good not to share. Lawrence Lessig outlines two new movements in America; Change Congress and Lessig for CA-12… maybe. This really is a fantastic video.

{ 0 comments }

swmp9-small.jpgWe’ve been talking a lot about firearm regulation here at Plunderbund this past year, and I even mentioned in passing I was taking a CCW/handgun safety course earlier in December. Last week, I purchased a handgun. As of today, I’m licensed to carry that handgun concealed. I wanted to relate my impressions of the process.

The good:

  • The training course I took. The state mandates certain minimum training requirements to apply for a concealed carry license, which this class met and exceeded. It was fun and informative. Frankly, I wouldn’t be disappointed if state law were amended to make the 12 hour course I took be the minimum. More later.
  • The CCL application process. Fill out a form, provide a passport photo, your training certificate, and $55 and the county sheriff will run an FBI background check to make sure you aren’t on the bad guy list. In my case, my license was ready in under a day because (unlike what some right-wing “journalists” might say about me) the government already trusts me enough to tell me state secrets. In Franklin County, due to the professionalism of the sheriff, turnaround is usually about a week for the average citizen.
  • The firearm purchasing process. Again, a form to be filled out and an “instant” (about 10-15 minutes) background check with the FBI. I don’t know exactly what the feedback to the merchant is (yes/no, or more detailed), but the process is relatively painless.

What I didn’t like about the process:

  • I know the training requirements are relatively low – like I mentioned before, I’d like them increased to meet at least what I underwent. Perhaps more. While our instructors were quite good, there is still very limited range time, and I saw unsafe practices by other students a few times that really ought to be trained out of them before they have an accidental/negligent discharge.
  • I’d like the purchasing process to be both easier and harder. In other words, I think someone should be required safety training (via a current “firearms license”, pretty much identical to the CCL) in order to purchase, and the verification process should consist of simply showing your license (and having it verified as legit – say via a scanner like a credit card authorization). Easier and harder at the same time.
  • There are some goofy aspects of the law that should be fixed. For example, to be carrying a gun in a car legally if it’s not on your person it must be (a) in a visible case (that may be unlocked) or (b) in a hidden case that must be locked. Huh? Similarly, it’s a 4th degree felony to be carrying concealed in an establishment with a class-D liquor license (ie, serves “for consumption” on premises), but it’s a 5th degree felony to be waving a gun around while rip-roaring drunk in public. Goofy.

Supreme Court cases reviewing laws pertaining to firearms have held that the “a well regulated militia” phrase of the 2nd Amendment means that reasonable regulation of firearms ownership is constitutional. Given the consequences of irresponsible gun ownership, a certain minimum standard of training in proper safe handling and use of firearms as a prerequisite to ownership is entirely reasonable. Based on my experiences, I think the training I received has been very useful towards teaching and beginning to ingrain safe handling practices, and every gun owner should undergo similar training at a minimum. Firearm ownership is constitutionally protected, and there are many legitimate reasons for firearm ownership from sporting to defense to hunting to an unorganized militia to a safeguard against governmental tyranny. An educated and capable citizenry is in everyone’s best interest.

(Photo of my Smith & Wesson Military & Police model 9mm sidearm, personal defense rounds, and my concealed carry license.)

{ 3 comments }

Mudblogging…

by Brian on December 3, 2007 · Comments

There’s been lots of smoke out in the blogosphere recently about Marc Dann. And while Dann’s performance hasn’t been quite at the level I might have hoped, that doesn’t really excuse the kind of personal mudslinging that’s been going on sans evidence. I don’t want to link to the RABid post in question, partially because it prints all kinds of rumor without any facts to back any of it up, but it should be easy enough to find yourself if you are interested.

Matty, however, makes an interesting statement in the comments:

This story is true, but just like much of what is talked about in blogs, it is unsourced.

I have a serious problem with that. No, bloggers aren’t journalists, but it is my belief that we have a responsibility to remain factual. I, personally, have been the subject of completely untrue speculation, which has impacted me in “real life”. I have little doubt that the poster of those rumors thought he was correct, but I know he did so without any actual evidence because none of it was true.

Now, Matty has a history of posting all kinds of crazy, wild, untrue stuff. He propagated the “Strickland is gay” meme sans any kind of evidence whatsoever. His reputation as a trustworthy source is tarnished. It’s one thing to make reasonable speculation, particularly in policy areas. It’s another entirely to smear someone personally for political gain.

Even if what Matty claims is true – and I’ve seen absolutely zero evidence of it – what relevance is it to Dann’s performance as AG? This is gutter politics at its worst. And depending on how pissed off I was, I might refuse to dignify a question with an answer, if I found the question insulting enough. That’s not proof of anything.

And just to prove I’m not being partisan about this, I found Jerid’s “Trent Lott is gay” stuff silly at best. There is a perfectly legitimate thing to attack his resignation about, and that’s the new lobbying rules.

Can’t we please try to stick to factual stuff that is relevant? I know Matty is a partisan hack, so that might be a bit much to expect, but…

{ 8 comments }

American prominence on the world stage has not been due to some issue of “national character”; our people are not inherently different than people anywhere else in the world. But we have, in the past, had better educational resources, and a greater emphasis on science and engineering. But no longer.

Back in September, I wrote that America is out of touch and behind the times on climate change and economic reform. It is mired in a stagnant war that the rest of the west has abandoned or is abandoning. American global influence is in decline, the country having lost the respect of allies and the credibility to lead. As we’ve seen yet again in last week’s brinkmanship by Turkey, American diplomacy has all the vim and vigour of Fred Thompson. For now America remains the world leader, but it’s moving steadily from superpower to first among equals. Nowhere is this more evident than in the sciences.

In the half-century following the second world war US universities were magnets for students and academics from around the world. Crucially, many foreign graduate students studying the physical sciences, biological sciences, IT and engineering stayed after graduation. As the Gathering Storm report notes: “Government spending on R&D soared after World War II, and … as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP) reached a peak of 1.9% in 1964.” In the last six or seven years, however, that tide has turned. Overseas institutions and companies are increasingly competitive, and federal and state funding for science and engineering has fallen significantly, to just 0.8% of GDP. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are sucking up federal money, with President Bush last week asking Congress to raise the war budget for 2008 to $196bn. That’s quite an opportunity cost.

While the US is still a world leader in science and technology, the gap is closing, and rapidly. China and India crank out engineers at a rate that dwarfs ours. As we’ve documented here at Plunderbund, belief in scientific theories are alarmingly low here compared to other industrialized nations around the world. Federal research dollars – the stuff that funds core research with little immediate ROI (and thus rarely funded by private industry) are actually shrinking under the Bush Administration. One area where we remain far ahead of the rest of the world – where we spend more than everyone else combined and more than 10 times the next biggest spender – is in “defense”. That’s really the only thing keeping us afloat scientifically (and I should know – it’s how I make my living, and I see where the research dollars come from).

One interesting note from the AAAS data: the only reason the decline isn’t steeper is America’s increasing support for weapon systems development. This year’s Nobel prizes captured the mood. For the first time this century, Americans were not among those awarded the physics and chemistry prizes.

The era of American Exceptionalism is at an end. And it’s because our leaders would rather ban scientific research into stem cells and “teach the controversy” and undercut solid scientific education in our schools, rather than investing in the technology, infrastructure, and core science research necessary to keep us out in front of the rest of the world.

{ 0 comments }

A Nation of Bedwetters

by Brian on September 26, 2007 · Comments

This article by Rick Perlstein perfectly underlines what a bunch of sissies we’ve been over the entire Ahmadinejad visit. I’ve made this comparison elsewhere – why can’t be behave like we did when Nikita “We will bury you” Khrushchev visited during the height of the Cold War in 1959?

Nikita Khrushchev disembarked from his plane at Andrews Air Force Base to a 21-gun salute and a receiving line of 63 officials and bureaucrats, ending with President Eisenhower. He rode 13 miles with Ike in an open limousine to his guest quarters across from the White House. Then he met for two hours with Ike and his foreign policy team. Then came a white-tie state dinner. (The Soviets then put one on at the embassy for Ike.) He joshed with the CIA chief about pooling their intelligence data, since it probably all came from the same people—then was ushered upstairs to the East Wing for a leisurely gander at the Eisenhowers’ family quarters. Visited the Agriculture Department’s 12,000 acre research station (“If you didn’t give a turkey a passport you couldn’t tell the difference between a Communist and capitalist turkey”), spoke to the National Press Club, toured Manhattan, San Francisco (where he debated Walter Reuther on Stalin’s crimes before a retinue of AFL-CIO leaders, or in K’s words, “capitalist lackeys”), and Los Angeles (there he supped at the 20th Century Fox commissary, visited the set of the Frank Sinatra picture Can Can but to his great disappointment did not get to visit Disneyland), and sat down one more with the president, at Camp David. Mrs. K did the ladies-who-lunch circuit, with Pat Nixon as guide. Eleanor Roosevelt toured them through Hyde Park. It’s not like it was all hearts and flowers. He bellowed that America, as Time magazine reported, “must close down its worldwide deterrent bases and disarm.” Reporters asked him what he’d been doing during Stalin’s blood purges, and the 1956 invasion of Hungary. A banquet of 27 industrialists tried to impress upon him the merits of capitalism. Nelson Rockefeller rapped with him about the Bible.

Had America suddenly succumbed to a fever of weak-kneed appeasement? Had the general running the country—the man who had faced down Hitler!—proven himself what the John Birch Society claimed he was: a conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy?

No. Nikita Khrushchev simply visited a nation that had character. That was mature, well-adjusted. A nation confident we were great. We had our neuroses, to be sure—plenty of them.

But look now what we have lost. Now when a bad guy crosses our threshhold, America becomes a pants-piddling mess.

But—they sputter—Ahmadinejad has has promised to wipe Israel off the map!

Well, Khrushchev had promised to wipe the U.S. off the map. (“We will bury you.”) And, unlike Mr. A, who has but some possible stores of fissile material, Mr. K very much had the means, motive, and opportunity to do it—thousands of nuclear-tipped rockets aimed at every city in the land.

In 2004 I thought this country was full of neocon idiots. Now I realize that we are a bunch of weak-willed sissies. We are collectively terrified of Lite-Brites and tin-pot dictators on the other side of the world who can’t even control their own countries. And we’ve been made that way by the conservative scare-mongering (Perlstein points out that the John Birch Society was doing the same stuff neocons are now back then). I’m actually to the point of revulsion with all this cowardice. Cowardice hidden behind blustery bravado.

Afraid of terrorists. Afraid of people who say bad things. Afraid of homosexuals. Afraid of criminals. Afraid of atheists. Afraid of black people. Afraid of hispanics. Is this what we’ve become? A nation of people who carry concealed weapons out of fear? Who attack other nations because of fear? Who freak out because some kid has a home-made LED display on her chest out of fear it might be a bomb? Who preach hate towards homosexuals or immigrants because of an irrational fear that granting equal rights to others will somehow invalidate the rights of the privileged? Who react in terror when the bigoted President of another country requests to visit Ground Zero?

If this is what we’ve become, I’m disgusted at our national character. We used to be great.

{ 3 comments }

I’m pretty sure I’ve posted this before (probably on my old blog), but I think it’s poignant, so I’m going to post it again. (What are you gonna do ’bout it, huh?)

{ 0 comments }

The possible new AG

by Brian on September 17, 2007 · Comments

Rumors are that Michael Mukasey will be tapped by Bush to be the new Attorney General. I don’t know a lot about the man, other than the disappointing fact that he ruled that US citizen Jose Padilla could be held without charges as an “enemy combatant” by President Bush (even tho he did force the gov’t to let Padilla have access to a lawyer. Small steps, I suppose.).

However, what piqued my interest wasn’t that he’s a Yalie; it’s that his son Marc works for Giuliani’s law firm (heading up the white collar crime defense practice in NYC). Am I the only one who finds it interesting how incestuous the entire American power structure is? It is, literally, an Old Boy’s Club. That alone might be enough of a reason to run away from Hillary (and Romney and Giuliani and…).

{ 0 comments }

Wingnuts are always going on about “angry liberals”. Well, no shit.

Think about it. Since 1998, we’ve witnessed the first presidential impeachment since the 1860s, the first presidential election to go into “overtime” since the 1870s; the first attack on the continental United States since 1812; the first major preemptive “war of choice” in U.S. history; and the first televised destruction of an American city. I don’t mean to equate any of these non-9/11 occurances with what we witnessed that day, but it has been an extraordinary span of time.

If you want to truly understand why Democrats (especially those whose entire formative political experience has been the last decade) are so often “angry,” remember the behavior of the leadership of the Republican Party in all of the non-9/11 events I’ve mentioned. And then remember what the president and vice president have done to destroy the national unity and worldwide symphathy this country enjoyed just after 9/11, typically viewing domestic unity and global approval with ill-disguised contempt.

Some of us are also angry at elected (Democratic) officials who aren’t forceful enough about addressing the Republican failures mentioned above.

{ 0 comments }