From the category archives:

State Politics

Here’s yet another story registered Republican Joe Hallett has based on his own prior reporting about John Kasich that he’s, so far, failed to mention.

In the July 15, 2005 edition of the Columbus Dispatch, Joe Hallet reported that Republicans were trying to draft John Kasich to run for Governor.  Kasich said he wouldn’t challenge Betty Montgomery or Jim Petro… basically, he’d only run to stop Ken Blackwell to get the nomination:

Kasich has told political allies he won’t run against Petro or Montgomery, whom he considers friends. He would, however, take on Blackwell, whose fiscal proposals Kasich views as irresponsible, sources said.

So in 2005, Joe Hallett reported that John Kasich was considering challenging Ken Blackwell because Ken Blackwell’s fiscal proposals were “irresponsible.”  At the time, the only policy of Ken Blackwell’s that John Kasich could have possibly be referring to was Blackwell’s TEL amendment which would have limited the growth of state and local spending by constitutional fiat.

Now John Kasich is talking about a tax plan that will, under any timetable, call for the elimination of 40% of the State’s revenues and cannot even bring himself to say that he’s any different from Ken Blackwell on policy.  And Joe Hallet doesn’t even bring it up.

I’m starting to understand why Matt Naugle was curiously absent from the Kasich-Taylor presser and has been silent lately.  If I were the Kasich-Taylor folks, I’d be worried about Naugle.

{ 0 comments }

I’m going to give you a Madden playbook why John Kasich’s courtship of State Auditor Mary Taylor makes no sense for anyone but John Kasich.  But let’s start with the most obvious point: it is absolute insanity for the Republicans to risk the only Apportionment Board seat they held in 2006 by moving an incumbent who was on track for a relatively safe re-election so that she can run for the non-essentially (from both a political and governing sense) Lt. Governor slot.

It’s is amazingly insane.  Second, if it were a done deal, Kasich wouldn’t first float it through Jon Keeling’s blog and then let the Cleveland Plain Dealer and Columbus Dispatch’s Joe Hallett write about as if it weren’t.  They’d just announced it.

Read Hallett’s column and tell me it doesn’t sound like Hallett isn’t practically serenading for John Kasich’s public political courtship of Mary Taylor.  Kasich is trying to put Taylor on the spot:  join my ticket and help me keep the Tea Bag base from deserting me by November when they realize how I’ve been an anti-establishment phony for the past year, or publicly embarrass me, the Republican standard bearer.  (Most of Kasich’s arguments don’t even make sense.  Taylor could arguably attack Strickland just as easily running for re-election.)

Believe me, if the GOP establishment wanted Taylor to be Kasich’s running mate, Kasich wouldn’t feel the need to put Taylor on the spot so publicly.  It would have been an arranged political marriage and announced, no such speculation has existed in the past.  Kasich is doing this because there is strong resistance in the Republican party to having this ticket, just look at the comments on Keeling’s blog.

Despite Taylor’s claimed fundraising woes, she’s still the only Republican to survive 2006, and nothing has happened since then that has made her more politically vulnerable.  Privately, most Democrats would even agree that Taylor was heavily favored for re-election.

Move her out of the Auditor’s race, and it’s an open seat (Taylor could not even resign in the hopes to make the Republican candidate to replace her the incumbent.  Any such vacancy would be filled by appointment by Governor Strickland.)  Suddenly, Hamilton County David Pepper has more than just a fighting chance for the office.

Who’s the most likely candidate to replace Taylor if she agreed to be Kasich’s running mate?  Well, it sure as hell isn’t Mike DeWine or Matt Dolan.  After all, what political calculation would require Kasich to need the support of Mary Taylor but DeWine as Auditor?

No, the most likely replacement to Taylor would be Josh Mandel, who is currently running for State Treasurer.  This means Kevin Boyce is likely re-elected as opposed to being considered highly vulnerable.

Even with Mandel and his millions in the race, it’s still a very competitive open seat race, and not one where Mandel’s qualifications put him at any unique advantage, either.

There is no way that Taylor leaves the Auditor’s race without making that race more likely for a Democratic takeover as a result.  None.

And if Boyce and Pepper wins, so does Jennifer Brunner.  It would be highly unlikely that any party captures the Auditor’s and Secretary of State’s races in open seat races while losing the gubernatorial race.  Therefore, with Pepper viewed as now likely to win the Auditor’s office, Brunner’s run for Senate isn’t as loaded down with Apportionment Board concerns.

And Jon Husted has to be wondering why he endured all the attacks over his residency only to see the ticket up ended such that his win is viewed as largely irrelevant.  Jennifer Garrison also loses as Democrats can support Strickland and Pepper while sitting on their hands over her.

If there is any hallmark of the Ohio Republican Party is that they tightly control the formation of their statewide tickets before now.  And just last week, ORP Chairman Kevin DeWine saw with justified confidence that his party was likely to win the Secretary of State’s race and Auditor’s office, thus an almost guarantee that they’d keep the Apportionment Board.  If Taylor bolts for Kasich, that is all upended just 41 days until petitions must be filed.

Which is, again, why it would be absolutely insane, both for the Ohio GOP and Taylor personally, for her to join Kasich’s ticket.  That’s why Kasich is resorting to putting his courtship so publicly to put Taylor on the spot.

It’s a huge gamble.  Because either Taylor does this and gives the Democrats a real shot at picking up a crucial seat on the Apportionment Board, or worse, she says no and publicly embarrasses Kasich and make him look incredibly weak.

You cannot look at the idea of Taylor on the ticket and not be reminded of the reason John McCain chose Sarah Palin.  Like Kasich, McCain picked Palin to try to encourage conservative excitement.  Like McCain, Kasich is courting Palin Taylor to present himself as outside the Bush Republican establishment.

If you doubt that there’s lack of enthusiasm for Kasich consider this: the only conservative blogger that has been writing about Kasich at all is his former congressional staffer … from Virginia.  There isn’t a single conservative blogger in Ohio who’s been writing with any excitement for John Kasich.  Not Kyle Sisk, WMD, Bizzyblog, Matt Naugle… none of them. They’ll, at best, write about Strickland, but Kasich is persona non grata.  Among Ohio conservative bloggers, John Kasich is getting a colder reception than Ken Blackwell did.

Chris Redfern has to be nearly drunk in delight at this development.  No matter what Taylor decides, he wins.  If Taylor runs, suddenly Kasich has made the Republican’s most secure Apportionment Board seat a tossup race.  If Taylor doesn’t join the ticket, then Kasich looks incredibly weak amongst his own Republicans.  Regardless, behind the scenes, Republicans are fuming that their frontrunner has created this predicament.

{ 4 comments }

Forget the GOP Senate primary.  If you’re looking for evidence of Tea Bagger rebellion in the GOP in Ohio, look at the potentially GOP primaries for the Secretary of State’s race (Former House Speaker/Man of Many Residences Jon Husted v. County Treasurer/Social Conservative gladfly Sandy O’Brien) and the Attorney General’s race (Former U.S. Sen. Mike DeWine v. Delaware County Prosecutor David Yost.)

Last night, the Yost campaign announced it was endorsed over DeWine by the Butler County Republican Party.  If you’re not familiar with Ohio GOP geopolitics, let me explain it to you this way.  Think about your last county party dinner and who your county party got as its featured speaker.  Maybe you got the Governor or a statewide.

Well, the Butler County GOP has regularly gotten people like the late Tony Snow or Karl Rove.  This is Boehner-land, after all.  The Ohio GOP held its state party dinner in nearby Warren County this year.

In order to get any endorsement, you had to get a supermajority, at least 60% of the county’s central committeepersons.  Yost got 68%…. over a former U.S. Senator.

DeWine has run, a, well, unusual campaign for someone with his political resume.   His campaign website hasn’t been updated at all since his announcement speech.  He was not a featured speaker at the Ohio GOP’s state dinner.  He’s seemed to be virtually nonexistent on the campaign trail ( I can find little evidence through local media of him actually campaigning.)

You have to wonder if DeWine is either extremely confident to the point of being complacent (Yost’s press release actually touted a poll showing DeWine still polling at 58% among registered Republican voters in a primary matchup with Yost) or simply disinterested.

Regardless, the Butler County GOP endorsement means than DeWine is facing a credible rebellion on his right flank smack dab in the middle of the Ohio GOP’s geopolitical base.

[UPDATE:]  In what can only be described as a dumb political move, the DeWine campaign later this afternoon actually gave credence to Yost’s spin that this endorse is significant by issuing a statement that was picked up by the Hamilton Pulse Journal:

“We are confident that Republican voters in Ohio will nominate Mike DeWine to be their Attorney General candidate. In poll after poll, Mike DeWine is the only candidate who can beat Richard Cordray. DeWine is known across the state by an overwhelming 93% of voters. As a former county prosecutor, he has the vision and experience to clean up corruption, fix the state crime lab, and make sure our state does everything possible to promote economic growth and job creation.”

I don’t think this response helps DeWine’s cause at all when all they say is that he can defeat Richard Corday because 93% of voters have heard of him.

{ 10 comments }

I like Ohio House Elections and Ethics Committee Chairman Dan Stewart (D-Columbus).  He was the main Democratic sponsor of H.B. 176, the bill that would have added sexual orientation and gender identity to Ohio’s housing and employment anti-discrimination laws.  But I don’t understand what his committee is doing killing the Golden Week of voting.

Today, his Committee voted out H.B. 260, which would make substantial changes to Ohio’s election laws.

According to the Columbus Dispatch, the Democratic House bill would get rid of the “Golden Week”- wherein people could register to vote and then cast an early ballot on the same day.

The bill does a number of good things and some downright silly (like requiring small U.S. flags be placed within 100 feet of every polling place regardless of whether the placement is physically or reasonably possible.)

The Dispatch notes that the House Committee also accepted an amendment by State Representative/Democratic Secretary of State candidate Jennifer Garrison (D?-Marietta) that would have Ohio adopt changes mirroring recently passed federal legislation that made it easier for military and overseas citizens to cast ballots.

The State Senate is proceeding with its own bill, and (surprise!) there are vast differences.  How much you wanna bet that State Senator Husted will get some easy amendments into the bill, too, including one virtually identical to Garrison’s?

Knowing this, I don’t understand why the House Democrats are getting rid of the Golden Week.  Why not pass their bill with it, and if you really are willing to get rid of it, then you’ve got something to negotiate away in a House-Senate conference?

Why did we, as a party, spend so much energy and litigation defending the Golden Week as a favorable election law provision that encourages the electorally disenfranchised to become enfranchised only to throw it away a year later?

{ 5 comments }

This came across the wire yesterday:

A Franklin County Common Pleas judge dismissed a lawsuit today that was aimed at blocking the Ohio secretary of state’s order requiring counties to offer paper ballots in the March 4 primary.

Judge Eric Brown ruled that the Union County commissioners, who filed the lawsuit, lack the legal authority to challenge Jennifer L. Brunner’s directive.

The directive applies to county boards of election, not county commissioners, Brown said. Because the Union County Board of Elections did not join the commissioners in the lawsuit, Brown ruled that he lacked the authority to consider whether the directive violates state and federal law.

“Unlike county agencies, boards of election are under the control of and answerable only to the secretary of state and not county officers,” Brown wrote.

All seems pretty basic, yes? Here’s where it gets interesting.

David Moots, chairman of the Union County Board of Elections, was pleased to see the challenge dismissed. He voted to uphold the directive of Brunner, a fellow Democrat, to prepare paper ballots.

“We already had the equipment. We could do it. We just needed to start working,” Moots said. “We’ve wasted a lot of time. Certainly we’ll pull this off, but they left us without much time to get this done.”

Moots attributed the legal challenge to “partisan politics” by Republican officials. County commissioners did not return calls seeking comment.

“I feel like all of our authority was usurped,” Moots said. “I feel pretty helpless up here. What is the purpose of the (elections) board if the commissioners can act in its place?”

{ 0 comments }

I have to agree with modernesquire – this kind of behavior is unacceptable. From the Dispatch:

Senate Minority Leader Ray Miller of Columbus, who hasn’t filed a valid campaign finance report since mid-2005, apparently did not do so again yesterday.

And modernesquire’s commentary:

There is absolutely no excuse for someone to violate our campaign finance laws this egregiously.

I agree completely. We don’t hammer on Republicans when they do this because they are Republican – we hammer on them because it’s wrong. I’m willing to give people the benefit of the doubt; after all, they are just human, and mistakes can be made, and deadlines overlooked. It happens. But like the old saying goes, “Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action.”

I don’t think there is any other way to view this than as willful disregard for laws designed to keep government, government officials, and those running for office accountable to the public they are supposed to serve.

{ 2 comments }

Not the US military, that’s for certain:

The U.S. military isn’t ready for a catastrophic attack on the country, and National Guard forces don’t have the equipment or training they need for the job, according to a report.

Even fewer Army National Guard units are combat-ready today than were nearly a year ago when the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves determined that 88 percent of the units were not prepared for the fight, the panel says in a new report released Thursday.

The US military, and especially the citizen reserves (ie, organized militia) of the National Guard, are tasked with defense of the nation, not being deployed to the pet war of a mad President. I have to think that federalizing the Guard 100 years ago was probably a mistake.

However, all is not lost. Ohio has (as do several other states) a state military force that is not under the control of the federal government. In fact, Ohio has two – the Ohio Naval Militia (ONM) and the Ohio Military Reserve (OHMR), both under the ultimate control of the Governor. Both receive almost zero funding from the State, and are entirely volunteer citizen military organizations – true militias. Members volunteer their time, train without pay, and even supply their own uniforms. The only time they would be paid is if they are deployed by the Governor to respond to a natural disaster, terrorist attack, or for whatever lawful deployment.

It should be noted, these are not combat units (tho, like all members of the military they may qualify on military weapons and may be outfitted out of the state Armory if deemed necessary), they are support units. They receive disaster management training, as well as military police training. Additionally, they are set up as cadre units, meaning that they are prepared to grow dramatically and absorb many new recruits in the event of a mobilization.

Unfortunately, Ohio is in a tough budgetary crisis right now. But once that’s settled, I think that Ohio needs to start looking out for the best interests of her citizens, and realize that if a natural disaster strikes, we may not be able to count on our National Guard units and equipment being available. Currently the OHMR gets a piddly $15,000 annually, and the ONM gets nothing. If the State government is serious about making up the shortfall in federal protection of Ohio citizens, they need to get serious about supporting the volunteers who make up the OHMR and ONM. A modest increase in budget should help them attract and retain qualified volunteers, and result in a more capable resource at the Governor’s disposal.

{ 0 comments }

From Lisa Renee at GCJ, this from the Bob Latta campaign:

Today, the Buehrer campaign, through his manager Jim Banks, has submitted a records request at BGSU. What is to gain by attacking my wife? All of these records are public. There has never been anything to hide. So what’s the point?

I guess in my opponent’s case, when you get tired of attacking the candidate you attack his family. To attack my wife is beyond belief. Please point me to another election in northwest Ohio when this has ever happened. Mr. Buehrer, I am only going to tell you this once, stay away from my wife. And let me also add my kids are also off limits. I had better add Maci our Boston Terrier to the list, too.

The office of the United States House of Representatives is one that should be respected and not trivialized. No wonder the public has been losing faith in our elected leaders and so many good people are staying out of public service.

From someone who runs a campaign like this one, I don’t expect an apology.

I completely agree with Bob in this regard, but maybe Bob should consult with his legal and public affairs consultant Scott Pullins who seems to be familiar with the art of attacking people’s family.

{ 3 comments }

I’m no huge ‘fern fan, but this is one of the funniest lines I’ve heard in some time. For those not in on the back story, this will help (even made BBC). Statewide Republicans are so desperate to deflect actual Republican sexual scandal that they have – and are – attempting to use this incident as a way to do that.

What would normally garner chuckles (and did from students) has turned into the latest faux scandal by state Republicans and wingnut bloggers alike. Today, the ‘fern takes this issue head on and all the blog reading must be rubbing off on him ‘cuz my man puts some attitude in it:

“Kevin, you attacked a 13 year old kid for political motives. What’s next Kev, kicking my dog? Telling kids there is no Santa Claus? Kevin, I know you are inexperienced in statewide politics, but at some point you are going to have to stop bullying kids and join us at the grown-ups table. Pick on someone your own size,” said Chris Redfern, Chairman of the Ohio Democratic Party.

LMFAO!

Sounds like a saying at the poker table for those who play like newbies. This is the grown up table. The kiddie table is that way! (ht Mike Matusow)

…I love the smell of desperation in the morning!

{ 0 comments }

PBS provides evidence of the GOP fixing the election here in Ohio. Of course, this will be ignored because of “media bias”.

Was there a White House plot to illegally suppress votes in 2004? Is there a similar plan for the upcoming elections? This week NOW examines documents and evidence that points to a Republican Party plan designed to keep Democrats from voting, allegedly by targeting people based on their race and ethnicity with key battleground states like Ohio and Florida of particular interest. “It was a partisan, discriminatory attempt to challenge voters of color,” Eddie Hailes, a senior attorney for The Advancement Project, a civil rights group, told NOW.

Was the White House involved? David Iglesias, one of the fired U.S. Attorneys, thinks so: “It’s reprehensible. It’s unethical, it’s unlawful. It may very well be criminal.” Iglesias told NOW he was repeatedly urged by his superiors at the Justice Department to investigate allegations of false voter registrations. After his investigations came up short, Iglesias said Republican officials got angry and complained to White House aide Karl Rove. Soon after Iglesias lost his job. As a result of allegations by Iglesias and others, Congress is investigating whether the White House acted unlawfully.

While Attorney General Alberto Gonzales refused to answer many questions about the controversy as he testified before the Senate this week, Iglesias told NOW he believes the White House is keeping documents from Congress to protect the Bush Administration. “That’s why there has been such a circling of the wagons around Karl Rove and Harriet Miers and Sarah Taylor. I believe there to be incriminating, possibly criminally incriminating evidence contained in those e-mails and other memoranda,” he said.

You can view the entire video online.

{ 0 comments }

When I finally got close to the front of the line at my polling place in 2004, a pollworker told me to cover my T-shirt. It had the words “Vote Explosion” on it.

Seeing as I had nothing to cover it with and had just spent 3 hours in line, I politely pointed out that there was no partisanship expressed by the shirt. Vote Explosion was just a loose group of friends registering folks to vote at rock shows. She replied that they were trying to avoid even the slightest possible implication of impropriety.

OK, fair enough. Polling places are supposed to be inner sanctums of nonpartisanhip. Neither voters nor pollworkers may wear political shirts, stickers, or buttons within a 100 foot radius. Although the words “Vote Explosion” aren’t explicitly partisan, neither are the words “Eagle Forum” or “MoveOn.” I think it was a wise move to err on the side of overzealousness, and simply prohibit T-shirts bearing all of the above.

The guy behind me in line loaned me his sweatshirt, and I was able to step forth to express my partisanship in the privacy of the voting booth. As an ongoing tribute of thanks to sweatshirt guy, ever since that day I’ve stowed an extra large, plain T-shirt in my purse whenever I go to vote – just in case a fellow voter is asked to cover up.

Until I read Monday’s Columbus Dispatch, it had never occurred to me that I might someday want to offer my spare shirt to a pollworker.

As part of its “Day of Democracy” effort to fill 2,200 pollworker spots in 548 precincts, Montgomery County Board of Elections deputy director Betty Smith told Dayton Right to Life executive director Christi Dodson that the organization’s logo would be permitted to be emblazoned on the chests of pollworkers.

A shortage of poll workers prompted the Montgomery County Board of Elections’ “Day of Democracy” program, which allowed companies and organizations to put forth their logo-wearing employees as elections workers.

The idea was that companies and organizations would be more willing to recruit employees or members to work the polls if they could get a little free advertising in return. Union members, for example, wore shirts bearing their union’s logo while working the May 8 primary.

According to the Dayton Daily News, “although Right to Life sent people to work at the polls in May, none wore the group’s shirts because they were not ready, said Christi Dodson, executive director.”

“This was strictly a marketing tool,” said Betty Smith, a Republican who is the board’s deputy director. “It was not put together to have any political agenda.”

Did Smith think that as long as all the organizations that produced pollworkers were allowed to wear their t-shirts, it would be o.k.? Equal opportunity and such?

Betty Smith obviously showed unacceptable ignorance and lack of good judgment, but equally culpable are organizations that took her up on the offer. Leaders of any politically-oriented organization should know better than to participate in this “marketing” plan. But Dodson, executive director of Dayton Right To Life, was prepared to take the opportunity a step further. In reference to her organization’s members who would be acting as pollworkers on election day (italics mine):

Obviously we will be there to answer questions about life issues, but I think we have to be very careful that we are helping at the polls that day,” Dodson said. “We are not there to convert somebody.”

Well, that got the attention of the good folks of the Montgomery County BOE. I’m not sure where they all were back when the “Day of Democracy” program was approved, but anyway:

[Dodson's] remark was greeted with shock by county board officials, who said poll workers are never to discuss any political issue, even if no voters are in the room.

“If anybody said we’re putting ‘right to life’ on shirts at the polls I’d have said ‘hold it,’ ” said Sue Finley, a Republican member of the board.

Finley, fellow Republican Jim Nathanson, and Democrats Tom Ritchie and Dennis Lieberman, said the only fair solution might be to ban all names and logos on elections workers’ clothing.

I can think of one cause that is appropriate for pollworkers to champion on election day: upholding the letter and spirit of election laws. That includes maintaining an atmosphere of impartiality. Anyone who is incapable of that has no business being a pollworker.

Which brings us back to the chronic pollworker shortage, which unfortunately is not limited to Montgomery County. Here in Franklin the BOE has over 5,000 spots to fill. Cuyahoga County needs 3,000 poll workers.

So I’m going to be a pollworker November 6 and I assure you I won’t be wearing my Vote Explosion shirt. Or my Planned Parenthood pin. Heck, just for kicks I might even make sure I’m not wearing pink, orange, or black.

It will be tough to keep my opinionated nature under wraps for a full day, but I’m up to the challenge. If you’re up for it too, please join me – sign up to be a pollworker. Click here for a full list of county Boards of Elections.

{ 5 comments }

So, we here at PB have taken some heat for attacking Matt Naugle for his falsehoods and irrelevant personal attacks. I understand that some people think we are wasting our time, and to a certain extent, I understand that view.

But I also understand that the “most prominent right-wing blog in Ohio” has a responsibility – be a good citizen in the blogging community. Lying about the facts is not a part of good citizenship. Neither is attacking family members of politicians or bloggers. I think ignoring these attacks is a mistake. I believe that this kind of ugliness must be confronted to be defeated.

As Jerid points out, this stuff has absolutely nothing to do with anything other than trying to embarrass and attack uninvolved third parties. The Ohio GOP has attacked Jerid’s mom. RABid has attacked Jerid’s dad. RABid has attacked Jennifer Brunner’s son. This stuff is pandemic. And I can’t wrap my head around the idea that anyone would think this relevant or even ethical.

This pretty much confirms my earlier decision to never ever link to RABid again. I’d ignore them entirely, if there wasn’t significant evidence that Naugle is running an astroturf blog over there, and thus is doing this at the behest of the Ohio GOP.

UPDATE: I should add – I have never, not once ever, been even remotely curious in digging for skeletons amongst Naugle’s family and friends. His mother, or father, aren’t out there blogging, carrying water, and as such aren’t even relevant. For that matter, I’m not terribly interested in Naugle’s skeletons. Unless he’s practicing one thing and preaching another, I don’t much care about his private life.

But then again, I have facts, truth, justice, and ethical behavior on my side. When you are losing the fight, I guess you might feel the need to steep to some pretty ugly behavior.

UPDATE 2: the offending post has suddenly disappeared from RABid. *POOF* – just like an “enemy combatant”. Somebody – probably one of Matty’s “handlers” from the Ohio GOP – must have decided that was in poor taste (and it was). Matty didn’t even have the nerve to leave a placeholder post apologizing for posting something so completely out of line to begin with. Well, this post isn’t going away – Matty may have retracted the post, but that doesn’t change the fact that one of the “top” conservative blogs in Ohio thought it appropriate, even fleetingly, to put something like that out there. This post will remain on the internet forever, a testament to what vicious scumbags wingnuts are. Coultergeist is cut from the same cloth.

{ 1 comment }

(ht Dave at PO)

armbrusterThe Dispatch has the headline: “Armbruster abused office, ethics probe finds: Ex-senator should face criminal charges, report says

According to documents released by the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, Armbruster, a North Ridgeville Republican, met in his Statehouse office with bureau officials and also had phone conversations in early 2006, pushing to get rates lowered for his company.

Armbruster, who then was vice chairman of a committee that dealt with most bureau-related legislation, eventually got an 88 percent rate reduction for his gas stations.

Another first given to us by corrupt Republicans:

For the first time, the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee today recommended that a member of the Ohio legislature — or in this case a former member — face criminal charges for unethical conduct.

Nice work! I’m with Dave in wondering how prominent this will be covered in the paper and for how long? Probably not long since it wasn’t his wife…

{ 1 comment }

Programming note really. I had a coffee meeting set up with Kelley Winzlaff, candidate for the Ohio House out of District 2, but we had a mix up in timing and weren’t able to get together. We’ve rescheduled and I look forward to chatting.

Hoping to get some audio maybe or video as well. Worst case, I’ll have a write up of the talk and go in to more detail about the race. Looking forward to it. If you have any questions to ask, leave them in the comments (especially those in the 2nd District).

An aside: Google Calendar kicks ass. I had it set up to email me an hour before the meeting and also send me a text message 30 minutes before. Probably the only reason I made it on time. I should tell Kelley about it. ;-)

{ 0 comments }

Rothenberg’s Shadows on High this week is a good one. Brian wonders aloud why our legislature makes time for such pressing things as gay adoption, the distance between patron and stripper, and Wexner Indie films while human trafficking and forced prostitution exists in the state.

Then again, if history is an indicator, we can just forget human trafficking exists and move on to gay adoption or unrated, independent films at the Wexner or whatever the evangelicals choose next in our never ending quest for “salvation-legislation.”

Salvation legislation. That’s a good line. Brian also points out that now that the legislature has taken care of their evangelical masters it is time to appease the gun lobby via HB 225, which among other things, removes any requirement incumbent upon a heat packer to inform an approaching police officer.

Brian thinks it ironic that while we can’t carry hair gel on a plane, we can carry a .45 under our coat without telling the cops. I think it makes perfect sense given that we must be ready for the terrorists when they invade our shores. Sheesh. Maybe that was so simple he couldn’t see it…

{ 1 comment }