Posts tagged as:

Ken Blackwell

Here’s yet another story registered Republican Joe Hallett has based on his own prior reporting about John Kasich that he’s, so far, failed to mention.

In the July 15, 2005 edition of the Columbus Dispatch, Joe Hallet reported that Republicans were trying to draft John Kasich to run for Governor.  Kasich said he wouldn’t challenge Betty Montgomery or Jim Petro… basically, he’d only run to stop Ken Blackwell to get the nomination:

Kasich has told political allies he won’t run against Petro or Montgomery, whom he considers friends. He would, however, take on Blackwell, whose fiscal proposals Kasich views as irresponsible, sources said.

So in 2005, Joe Hallett reported that John Kasich was considering challenging Ken Blackwell because Ken Blackwell’s fiscal proposals were “irresponsible.”  At the time, the only policy of Ken Blackwell’s that John Kasich could have possibly be referring to was Blackwell’s TEL amendment which would have limited the growth of state and local spending by constitutional fiat.

Now John Kasich is talking about a tax plan that will, under any timetable, call for the elimination of 40% of the State’s revenues and cannot even bring himself to say that he’s any different from Ken Blackwell on policy.  And Joe Hallet doesn’t even bring it up.

I’m starting to understand why Matt Naugle was curiously absent from the Kasich-Taylor presser and has been silent lately.  If I were the Kasich-Taylor folks, I’d be worried about Naugle.

{ 0 comments }

It looks like the MSM has finally picked up the story about LetOhioVote.

Julie Carr Smyth, Ohio’s AP Statehouse Reporter, put out a pretty good piece today summarizing what I’ve been talking about for weeks – and then taking it a step further.

She covered my main point at the beginning: everyone involved in LetOhioVote is in some way associated with Ken Blackwell. She even mentions Norm Cummings (proof she’s been reading Plunderbund?)

And then she moves a little closer to answering the question we’ve all been trying to answer: who’s funding these guys?

Phil Burress/Citizens for Community Values? The Arlington Group? (both Blackwell affiliated) Even ‘Anti-feminist’ Phyllis Schlafly is a possibility.

Good guesses, Ms. Smyth. And a very good article.

But you did forget to mention one important question: WHY are they doing it?

And I’m still convinced the answer is REVENGE. Pure and simple.

Thanks for reading, Julie. And stay tuned. Plunderbund is full of great story ideas.

{ 2 comments }

If you haven’t been following the recent drama involving RNC Chairman Michael Steele and too-much-of-a-religious-nut-to-be-RNC-chairman Ken Blackwell, then let me give you a quick overview…

Steele and Blackwell are two of the rarest individuals on earth: African American Republicans. Though they both belong to the same party, Steele is fairly moderate (by GOP standards) while Blackwell is a complete right-wing nutjob who hates gays and thinks women should have zero control over their own reproductive systems.

They both ran for RNC chairman this year – along with a couple of old, racist white guys.

The election process was far from simple and easily decided. It was long and drawn out and Blackwell actually stuck it out for a few rounds. But when it looked like Steele was going to win and Blackwell had absolutely no chance left, Ken threw his support behind Mike – who eventually pulled off the win.

It was a big day for Michael Steele and for the Republican party. To the outside world it showed that the party might actually be willing to address the issues of mainstream America and might actually find some support among regular, working-class Americans and not just crazy, religious nutjobs.

Unfortunately for Mike (and the party), the victory was short lived and every day since has been a crazy, uncontrollable ride downhill on an old, rusted-out radio flyer.

First Steele was attacked by Rush Limbaugh over some anti-Rush comments. And now he’s being attacked by former-supporter Ken Blackwell over some very reasonable and moderate comments about gays and abortion.

In a recent Townhall interview Ken Blackwell attacked Steele for his non-crazy views. According to Ken, “Chairman Steele, as the leader of America’s Pro-Life conservative party, needs to re-read the Bible, the U.S. Constitution, and the 2008 GOP Platform. He then needs to get to work — or get out of the way.”

Ouch.

I’m not going to go into the reasons this comment by Blackwell is completely and totally nuts. (in short: the bible and constitution say absolutely nothing about abortion or homosexuality.)

I think it’s sufficient to say that Steele was elected RNC chairman because he promised a more moderate approach that would expand the appeal of the party to regular Americans. But it looks like this approach – which I really do believe could save the Republican Party from extinction – is going to piss off so many ultra-conservatives that Mike will have to either abandon it or get kicked out of his position. And without a moderate voice at the helm, the Republican party will quickly find itself in the same position as The Greens or The Libertarian Party i.e. fucked.

Fucked for one reason and one reason alone: the rest of the party is afraid to stand up to selfish wingnuts like Blackwell and Limbaugh who are totally and completely out of touch with mainstream America.

If you are a Republican and you are looking for someone to blame for your recent electoral misfortunes, I recommend you write Mr. Limbaugh and Mr. Blackwell a letter telling them both to shut the fuck up or to ‘get out of the way’.

Otherwise you can kiss your party goodbye.

Now, before you decide to write off my opinion as the wishful thinking of a liberal blogger, please consider the fact that David Frum also thinks ultra-conservatives are pushing away moderates and marginalizing the GOP. According to Frum (the Bush speechwriter who coined the phrase ‘axis of evil’):

“My main problem with talk radio is things you’re doing to excite a loyal audience are very different than things you do to try to win back the departed middle” of the electorate. “We can’t win elections by getting our core voters agitated. But if you’re a talk radio host and you have 5 million who listen and there are 50 million people who hate you, you can make a nice living. If you’re a Republican Party, you’re marginalized.”

{ 6 comments }

Remember Ken Blackwell’s NAMBLA-supports-my-opponent argument?

It looks like McCain is pulling a Blackwell in his new ad: accusing Barack Obama of passing legislation to teach sex ed to kindergartners…

Obviously the accusation is a lie. Obama’s bill included “‘age appropriate’ sex-education for children as a means of teaching them what was proper or inproper touching, as well as to protect them against pedophiles”. Hardly the same thing as handing out flavored condoms with their milk and cookies.

But hey- why let the truth get in the way of political attacks.

The response from the Obama campaign was pretty good though:

It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls – a position that his friend Mitt Romney also holds. Last week, John McCain told Time magazine he couldn’t define what honor was. Now we know why.

{ 2 comments }

PolickerOH has named this week’s winners and losers. Ted Strickland is a winner:

The governor is picking off incumbent Repubilcans in competitive legislative seats by offering them jobs in his administration.

It’s really fun to beat your opponent at their own game. Gaming the system is, indeed, the game of the Ohio GOP.

Stivers and the GOP are losers:

They really missed the boat by accusing Kilroy of using a body-double in a parade. (link added)

That wingnut after wingnut blogger hopped on this thing makes it even sweeter.

I’d also mention that Naug Daug’s messiah himself, J. Kenneth Blackwell was also named a winner:

The former Secretary of State is starring in a TV ad against Barack Obama. In this economy, any work is good work.

ROFL!

{ 0 comments }