From the monthly archives:

February 2008

Cindy Lazarus has a new TV commercial …

It’s a positive, straightforward ad that highlights her experience.

Of course, the O’Grady people immediately issued a nasty and negative response claiming that the statements in Cindy’s ad are not “the truth”.

For example, they claim she was not a “respected judge” because she has not been a judge since 2005. What the hell does that have to do with anything?

And they claim she is not a “loyal democrat” because she did not vote in the last primary election. Which, of course, is bullshit.

Personally, I think a loyal Democrat is one who respects his fellow Democratic candidates enough not to try to bully them out of the primary race.

A loyal Democrat is one who respects Democratic voters enough to let them have a choice to vote for the candidate they want to represent them.

{ 5 comments }

Both campaigns seem to be taking advantage of online advertising targeting Ohio voters. For example, a search in Google for “Ohio Democratic Primary” returns two sponsored ads in the corner: one for Hillary and one for Barack.

google_ads.jpg

But the Obama people are taking it a step further with really flashy ad I just saw over at Ohio.com. It’s pretty cool, actually- starting as a small banner it expands to take up most of the page and includes video and other useful info.

obama_online_ad.jpg

{ 1 comment }

The BuckeyeStateBlog has the latest Hillary ad this morning and it is just jaw dropping the level to which she is stooping now as we near the March 4th firewall. Inevitability didn’t work. Retooling to “Change” didn’t work. Finding her voice didn’t work (not totally). Bullshit plagiarism charges didn’t work. Putting Bill out there didn’t work. What’s a girl to do?

PLAY THE FEAR CARD!

-

Un. Fucking. Real.

So this thing gets put up on YouTube today. I’ve not seen this on TV as yet (frankly I don’t watch much). If you see it, leave a note in the comments!

I might ad that I actually hope they make a huge buy in Ohio with this. HUGE. Because it won’t play to a Democratic primary. It might make the mouth-breathing knuckle draggers whoop it up like the Quest For Fire cast, but it just ain’t gonna play with Democrats who are mighty PISSED that these types of attacks got them George W. Bush. Bet.

Renee in Ohio says it best in comments at BSB (and I boosted it for the headline):

Hillary, Karl Rove called. He says he wants his playbook back. As soon as you’re done with it.

When can we be done with this? Seriously.

Update: Remember this from 2004?

{ 3 comments }

A new Survey USA poll asks Ohioans “Do you approve or disapprove of the job Ted Strickland is doing as Governor?”

Overall he’s at 51% – which isn’t too bad.

But this poll show something really interesting: a surprisingly huge drop in support from African Americans:

34% approve
56% disapprove

In the same poll back in early January, Ted’s approval rating among blacks was 30 points higher!

64% approve
29% disapprove

The survey doesn’t ask people why they approve or disapprove of the Governor, but it seems pretty obvious that this huge drop must, at least in part, be associated with Ted’s effusive and unwavering support for Hillary Clinton.

He’s got higher approval numbers now from REPUBLICANS (45%) than he does from African-Americans (34%)!

I imagine that once Obama wins the nomination, these numbers will balance out again. But who knows what will happen if Hillary can pull off a win next week.

{ 0 comments }

Texas Democrats are worried about rumors that Hillary’s campaign may plan to sue the Texas Democratic Party over their complicated process for selecting delegates.

They are so worried, in fact, that Chad Dunn, a lawyer for the party, sent out a letter to both campaigns warning them that legal action against the state party “could prove to be a tragedy for a reinvigorated Democratic process.”

I think this is a good time to remind the Clinton folks what happened to Dennis Kucinich back in January when HE sued the Texas Democratic Party…. he lost.

Back then, Dunn responded to the win by the party:

“The democracy in our state allows party members to make the rules. The party has a Constitutional right to govern itself, and that’s what the court found.”

{ 0 comments }

My wife says McCain sounds like Casey Kasem. I think that’s kinda funny. Not as funny as this, though. I only really mention the McCain thing as an excuse to post this video. Warning: Parental Advisory. Strong language. Don’t play this in an office setting without headphones.

You. Will. Die. Laughing.

{ 0 comments }

The numbers are coming in and they are breathtaking. It looks like the strategic loan – source of which we will probably never know – made by Hillary Clinton paid off in that it had the desired affect of getting snoozing supporters to write checks. They all had a collective “oh shit” moment that was, in my view, completely calculated. This is backed up by public statements now being made by the campaign:

The breakthrough moment, Mr. McAuliffe said, came after Mrs. Clinton announced early in the month that she had lent money to her campaign. “Our Internet exploded, and it has never stopped,” Mr. McAuliffe said.

Obama, however, is still leaps and bounds ahead and will stay there most likely. There are over a million now with a piece of this and they will most likely do another dip and contribute more. Team Obama is on course to raise nearly $50 million in this month alone. You’d have to be an absolute and complete political moron to think he’d limit himself to $85 million. You know McCain doesn’t want to – he’s just looking for any political hay. Hell, he’s already begging and pleading to opt out! Talk about a hypocrite!

Last two months:

January: Obama $36 million / Hillary $14 million
February: Obama ~$50 million / Hillary $35 million

That’s a two month shortfall of about $37 million for Team Billary. Still nice work duping supporters into a freakout with the loan thing. Genius, really. Gotta give it up for that! Way behind though and I imagine we’ll hear about how the evil Obama is outspending poor little old Hillary and how unfair it is. LOL. Yeah.

{ 0 comments }

img_0354.JPGI will be in Boston on March 4 for a trade show. But I got my vote in the hopper this afternoon. I hear this early voting thing is quite the rage. Hopefully the numbers will be huge. I’ve also been hearing of some discrepancies in what poll workers are trained and what voters are being told. I didn’t see any of that at the Delaware County BOE, but I did see 3 iVotronics and 1 old paper ballot looking thing (it was not used while I was there). The other thing I noted is that the place was busy. It looked like a low traffic polling location on an actual election day – no rush, but steady traffic during the time I was there (not long).

The Obama team is making a big push on early voting and has even bused people straight from rallies to boards of elections! Fire up? Fired Up! Ready to Vote? Ready to Vote!

-

Find your polling location and go vote! …for Obama! ;-)

{ 2 comments }

BLF Takes on AT&T

by Eric on February 28, 2008 · Comments

BLF takes on AT&T:

nsa.jpg

AT&T initially downplayed its heroic efforts in the War on Terror, preferring to serve in silence behind the scenes. “But then we realized we had a PR win on our hands,” noted AT&T V.P. of Homeland Security James Croppy. “Not only were we helping NSA cut through the cumbersome red tape of the FISA system, we were also helping our customers by handing over their e-mails and phone records to the government. Modern life is so hectic – who has time to cc the feds on every message? It’s a great example of how we anticipate our customers’ needs and act on them. And, it should be pointed out, we offered this service free of charge.”

{ 0 comments }

I know our friends on the political right live in perpetual fear of the dark skinned Muslims blowing them up. I’ve personally taken a lot of heat for repeatedly pointing out that overwhelmingly Muslims are not terror-supporting radicals. I was, of course, correct.

“Religion is an important part of life for the overwhelming majority of Muslims, and if it were indeed the driver for radicalisation, this would be a serious issue.”

But the study, which Gallup says surveyed a sample equivalent to 90 percent of the world’s Muslims, showed that widespread religiosity “does not translate into widespread support for terrorism,” said Mogahed, director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies.

About 93 percent of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are moderates and only seven percent are politically radical, according to the poll, based on more than 50,000 interviews.

In majority Muslim countries, overwhelming majorities said religion was a very important part of their lives — 99 percent in Indonesia, 98 percent in Egypt, 95 percent in Pakistan.

But only seven percent of the billion Muslims surveyed — the radicals — condoned the attacks on the United States in 2001, the poll showed.

Terrorism isn’t about religion – it’s about politics.

“Some actually cited religious justifications for why they were against 9/11, going as far as to quote from the Koran — for example, the verse that says taking one innocent life is like killing all humanity,” she said.

Meanwhile, radical Muslims gave political, not religious, reasons for condoning the attacks, the poll showed.

In fact, Muslims – even radical ones – actually like us and what we stand for, for the most part.

“The radicals are better educated, have better jobs, and are more hopeful with regard to the future than mainstream Muslims,” John Esposito, who co-authored “Who Speaks for Islam”, said.

“Ironically, they believe in democracy even more than many of the mainstream moderates do, but they’re more cynical about whether they’ll ever get it,” said Esposito, a professor of Islamic studies at Georgetown University in Washington.

Gallup launched the study following 9/11, after which US President George W. Bush asked in a speech, which is quoted in the book: “Why do they hate us?”

“They hate… a democratically elected government,” Bush offered as a reason.

“They hate our freedoms — our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.”

But the poll, which gives ordinary Muslims a voice in the global debate that they have been drawn into by 9/11, showed that most Muslims — including radicals — admire the West for its democracy, freedoms and technological prowess.

What they do not want is to have Western ways forced on them, it said.

We are a target because of our foreign policy. This is something many of us on the left have been saying for nearly 7 years now. And it’s evidence that George Bush has growing radical terrorism by way of his belligerent foreign policy, rather than successfully fighting it.

The poll has given voice to Islam’s silent majority, said Mogahed.

“A billion Muslims should be the ones that we look to, to understand what they believe, rather than a vocal minority,” she told AFP.

I fully expect the right-wing here in the States do to the same thing they always do when confronted with actual evidence that challenges their worldview – ignore it.

{ 2 comments }

It’s often claimed by those who oppose immigration (illegal or not) that immigrants commit crime at an alarming rate and are a threat to public safety. Turns out, it isn’t true.

People born outside the United States make up about 35 percent of California’s adult population but account for about 17 percent of the adult prison population, the report by the Public Policy Institute of California showed.

According to the report’s authors the findings suggest that long-standing fears of immigration as a threat to public safety are unjustified. The report also noted that U.S.-born adult men are incarcerated at a rate more than 2 1/2 times greater than that of foreign-born men.

“Our research indicates that limiting immigration, requiring higher educational levels to obtain visas, or spending more money to increase penalties against criminal immigrants will have little impact on public safety,” said Kristin Butcher, co-author of the report and associate professor of economics at Wellesley College.

Wait – it gets better!

Among men 18 to 40, the population most likely to be in institutions because of criminal activity, the report found that in California, U.S.-born men were institutionalized 10 times more often than foreign-born men (4.2 percent vs. 0.42 percent).

Among other findings in the report, non-citizen men from Mexico 18 to 40 — a group disproportionately likely to have entered the United States illegally — are more than eight times less likely than U.S.-born men in the same age group to be in a correctional institution (0.48 percent vs. 4.2 percent).

This should put the “immigrants bring crime to our streets” myth to bed.

{ 1 comment }

At least, the CEO of the Orange County Register is for Obama.

Both men cited the teachings of various libertarian heavyweight philosophers, most notably John Stuart Mill, whom I heretofore believed to be an inventor of breakfast cereals. There was some back-and-forth over the practical vs. the philosophical approach to politics, and Flanders said that in this election, for him, “the No. 1 issue is who will get us out of Iraq.”

OK, I’m thinking, if you really mean that, there’s only one major candidate you can support. But there’s no way you are going to stand there and say you support him.

Editorial writer Steve Greenhut told Flanders he thought he was really making an argument for not voting. Not true, Flanders said, and then he did it. He said the words, “Barack Obama.” As in, that’s who any true freedom-lover should vote for.

At that moment, I thought the wailing ghost of R.C. Hoiles would burst through the ceiling and the floor beneath us would split into a ragged, cleaving maw we’d all tumble into – swallowed whole by the earth. Better no company at all than one whose CEO supports a Democrat for president.

But there was a hush as Flanders reasoned that Obama is the best candidate to work on four top libertarian reforms: 1) Iraq withdrawal, 2) restoring the separation of church and state; 3) easing off victimless crimes such as drug use; 4) curtailing the Patriot Act.

As someone whose intellectual position in college was “left-leaning libertarian”, I can totally relate. Liberals, in general, are a lot better at protecting the liberty of the individual than conservatives. I just wish more libertarians would manage to figure that out.

{ 0 comments }

Description of the new ad from Hillary’s campaign: “Ohio Governor Ted Strickland says we need a president who will be a fighter — and that’s how he sees Hillary Clinton”

{ 0 comments }

Torture.

by Brian on February 28, 2008 · Comments

HT to Andrew Sullivan; a WWII poster denouncing torture.

WWII Torture Poster

Oh, how far we’ve fallen.

{ 0 comments }

No seriously. We’d own Ohio too if it were available. Thought about sarcasm and hilarity, but politics will do for now.

Update: Guess who owns President? Yep. You guessed it.

{ 2 comments }